[1]孙磊磊,徐泽华,秦英斌,等.“访客”模式下历史街区旅居空间设计研究——以苏州平江路大新桥巷25—27号地块为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):40-47.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
　SUN Leilei,XU Zehua,QIN Yingbin,et al.Research on the Design of Touristic Space in Historic District under the Guidance of Visitor：a Case Study of Daxinqiao Lane 25-27 in Suzhou Pingjiang Road[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):40-47.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
点击复制

“访客”模式下历史街区旅居空间设计研究——以苏州平江路大新桥巷25—27号地块为例()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
36
期数:
2022年12期
页码:
40-47
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Design of Touristic Space in Historic District under the Guidance of Visitor：a Case Study of Daxinqiao Lane 25-27 in Suzhou Pingjiang Road
文章编号:
1674-4144（2022）012-0040-08
作者:
孙磊磊; 徐泽华; 秦英斌; 张 靓
孙磊磊，苏州大学建筑学院教授，中国历史文化名城（苏州）研究院副院长；徐泽华，苏州大学建筑学院硕士研究生；秦英斌，苏州大学建筑学院硕士研究生；张靓，苏州大学建筑学院副教授。
Author(s):
SUN Leilei; XU Zehua; QIN Yingbin; ZHANG Liang
关键词:
访客模式; 历史街区; 旅居空间; 设计策略
Keywords:
visitor pattern; historic district; touristic space; design strategy
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在发展遗产旅游和“体验经济”的背景下，体验和参与成为人们旅居生活的新追求。梳理国内历史街区旅居空间保护与更新的相关研究与发展趋势，针对主客矛盾日益加重、开放空间消极局促、传统商业消沉衰退等问题，提出以“访客”为导向——集约化、体验性、共享式的空间模式，探讨其在特殊历史环境下的适用性、优势及作用，在此基础上提出文脉传承、空间叠合、市井留真、叙事体验等4个方面的设计策略，并以苏州大新桥巷25—27号地块设计为例，系统构建从“游”到“访”的空间体验，为本土历史街区旅居空间的转型提升提供新范本。
Abstract:
Under the background of heritage tourism and experience economy, experience and participation have become the new pursuit of people’s tourism life. This article combs the related research and development trend of touristic space protection and renewal in domestic historic districts, puts forward the intensive, experiential and shared visitor-oriented space model in view of the conflicts of travel and residence, negativity of open space, and decline of traditional commerce, and discusses its applicability, advantage and function in the special environment. On this basis, this research puts forward four aspects of design strategies, such as context inheritance, spatial overlap, environmental truthfulness and narrative experience, and takes the design of the residence at 25-27 Daxinqiao Lane as an example to construct the space experience from tour to visit, which provides a new model for the transformation and promotion of touristic spaces in local historic districts.

相似文献/References:

[1]滕有平.江南城市历史街区空间生产策略研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):39.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(12):39.
[2]薛名辉,万子祎,李佳.城市历史街区公共空间更新的新文旅视角与新赋能机制——以哈尔滨市为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
　XUE Minghui,WAN Ziyi,LI Jia.New Cultural Tourism Perspective and New Enabling Mechanism of Urban Historic Blocks Public Space Renewal[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
[3]项振海,李青,班鹏飞,等.历史街区中人群活动偏好的主体差异及其影响因素——以昆明市文明街历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
　XIANG Zhenhai,LI Qing,BAN Pengfei,et al.Subject Differences and Influencing Factors of Crowd Activity Preferences in Historic Districts：a Case Study of Wenming Street Historic District in Kunming City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
[4]周 红,敖天姣.基于老年友好的历史街区生活性街道边缘空间重构——以湘潭市通济门片区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(4):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
　ZHOU Hong,AO Tianjiao.Research on Reconstruction Design of Living Street Edge Space in Historical Blocks from the Perspective of Age-Friendliness: A Case Study of Xiangtan Tongjimen Area[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(12):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
[5]左 力,时钰琳.纽约开发权转移政策与建成遗产保护更新研究——以高线公园为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(12):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
　ZUO Li,SHI Yulin.Research on the Transfer of Development Rights and the Preservation and Renewal of Built Heritage in New York: A Case Study of the High Line Park[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(12):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
[6]王中德,刘淑清.空间正义失范与重申——基于城市权利的历史街区更新路径重构[J].中国名城,2024,38(9):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
　WANG Zhongde,LIU Shuqing.Spatial Justice Disorder and Revitalization: Reframing the Renewal Path of Historic Districts Based on the Right to the City[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
[7]路 旭,连羚毓,孙湛博,等.基于城市针灸理论的历史街区失落空间更新——以沈阳北市场为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]
　LU Xu,LIAN Lingyu,SUN Zhanbo,et al.The Renewal of the Lost Spaces in Historical Blocks Based on Urban Acupuncture Theory: Taking Shenyang Beishi Market as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]
[8]李和平,王雨晗.社区参与测度下的历史街区保护发展研究——以重庆市磁器口历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
　LI Heping,WANG Yuhan.Research on the Protection and Development of Historic Districts under the Measurement of Community Participation: A Case Study of the Ciqikou Historic District in Chongqing[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
[9]潘鹏程.国土空间规划体系下历史街区保护规划三性研究——以南京秦淮区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):72.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.010]
　PAN Pengcheng.Research on the Three Characteristics of Historical Block Protection Planning under the National Land Space Planning System: Taking Qinhuai District in Nanjing as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):72.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.010]
[10]李 渊,连琦弋,杜亚男,等.基于数智化技术的历史街区韧性研究综述[J].中国名城,2025,39(3):48.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.003.006]
　LI Yuan,LIAN Qiyi,DU Yanan,et al.A Review of Resilience Studies on Historic Districts Based on Digital Intelligence Technologies[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(12):48.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.003.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-01-04