[1]李和平,王雨晗.社区参与测度下的历史街区保护发展研究——以重庆市磁器口历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):3-9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
 LI Heping,WANG Yuhan.Research on the Protection and Development of Historic Districts under the Measurement of Community Participation: A Case Study of the Ciqikou Historic District in Chongqing[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):3-9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
点击复制

社区参与测度下的历史街区保护发展研究——以重庆市磁器口历史街区为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年12期
页码:
3-9
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Protection and Development of Historic Districts under the Measurement of Community Participation: A Case Study of the Ciqikou Historic District in Chongqing
文章编号:
1674-4144(2024)012-0003-07
作者:
李和平王雨晗
李和平,重庆大学建筑城规学院教授,山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室成员,博士生导师;王雨晗,重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
LI HepingWANG Yuhan
关键词:
历史街区社区参与评价体系更新保护磁器口
Keywords:
historic districtscommunity participationevaluation systemrenewal and protectionCiqikou
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史街区承载着城市社会变迁的记忆,但其保护与更新大多存在形式化、低效等问题,且常常因忽视社区价值使得街区生活的原真性遭到破坏、地域文化不断消解、居民的基本需求得不到满足,使得越来越多的居民开始关注周边的社会事务,希望参与其中行使自己的权利。基于社区参与视角,运用AHP、SPSS及ArcGIS等基本研究方法,建立历史街区社区参与的评价指标体系,对重庆市磁器口历史街区的发展路径展开调查研究。从使用者角度,通过半结构访谈和问卷调查等方式,了解居民对社区参与在推动历史街区发展过程中的满意度。最后研究提出基于社区参与的合力机制模型,并从产权明晰、设施完善、资源活化、制度治理等方面提出历史街区保护发展路径的改进策略。
Abstract:
Historic districts preserve the memory of urban social changes, but most of their protection and renewal suffer from issues like formalization and inefficiency, and they frequently disregard community values, which erodes the uniqueness of neighborhood life, dissolves regional culture, and leaves residents’ basic needs unmet. As a result, an increasing number of locals are becoming aware of local social affairs and hope to get involved in them in order to exercise their legal rights. This paper investigates the development path of the Ciqikou Historic District in Chongqing and establishes an evaluation index system for community participation in historic districts based on the perspective of community participation. It does this by using basic research methods like AHP, SPSS, and ArcGIS. Semi-structured interviews and surveys are employed to get insight into the users’ perceptions of residents’ satisfaction with community involvement in advancing the historic district’s development. Lastly, the study provides solutions for improving the protection and development route of historic districts in terms of well-defined property rights, better amenities, resource revitalization, and institutional governance. It also suggests a model of a synergy mechanism based on community engagement.

相似文献/References:

[1]滕有平.江南城市历史街区空间生产策略研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):39.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(12):39.
[2]程超,黄志毅,张致伟.居民自治视角下老旧社区公共空间体系建构——基于武汉市楚宝里片区的实证研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.008]
 CHENG Chao,HUANG Zhiyi,ZHANG Zhiwei.The Construction of the Old Community Public Space System from the Perspective of Residents Autonomy:Based on the Empirical Research of Chubaoli Area in Wuhan[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.008]
[3]薛名辉,万子祎,李佳.城市历史街区公共空间更新的新文旅视角与新赋能机制——以哈尔滨市为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
 XUE Minghui,WAN Ziyi,LI Jia.New Cultural Tourism Perspective and New Enabling Mechanism of Urban Historic Blocks Public Space Renewal[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
[4]项振海,李青,班鹏飞,等.历史街区中人群活动偏好的主体差异及其影响因素——以昆明市文明街历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
 XIANG Zhenhai,LI Qing,BAN Pengfei,et al.Subject Differences and Influencing Factors of Crowd Activity Preferences in Historic Districts:a Case Study of Wenming Street Historic District in Kunming City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
[5]孙磊磊,徐泽华,秦英斌,等.“访客”模式下历史街区旅居空间设计研究——以苏州平江路大新桥巷25—27号地块为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
 SUN Leilei,XU Zehua,QIN Yingbin,et al.Research on the Design of Touristic Space in Historic District under the Guidance of Visitor:a Case Study of Daxinqiao Lane 25-27 in Suzhou Pingjiang Road[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
[6]周 红,敖天姣.基于老年友好的历史街区生活性街道边缘空间重构——以湘潭市通济门片区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(4):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
 ZHOU Hong,AO Tianjiao.Research on Reconstruction Design of Living Street Edge Space in Historical Blocks from the Perspective of Age-Friendliness: A Case Study of Xiangtan Tongjimen Area[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(12):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
[7]左 力,时钰琳.纽约开发权转移政策与建成遗产保护更新研究——以高线公园为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(12):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
 ZUO Li,SHI Yulin.Research on the Transfer of Development Rights and the Preservation and Renewal of Built Heritage in New York: A Case Study of the High Line Park[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(12):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
[8]张晓杰,王 孝.活跃性主体和理性式的社区居民参与治理模型研究[J].中国名城,2024,38(7):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.007.004]
 ZHANG Xiaojie,WANG Xiao.Research on the Model of Active Subject and Rational Community Residents’ Participation in Governance[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.007.004]
[9]王中德,刘淑清.空间正义失范与重申——基于城市权利的历史街区更新路径重构[J].中国名城,2024,38(9):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
 WANG Zhongde,LIU Shuqing.Spatial Justice Disorder and Revitalization: Reframing the Renewal Path of Historic Districts Based on the Right to the City[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
[10]路 旭,连羚毓,孙湛博,等.基于城市针灸理论的历史街区失落空间更新——以沈阳北市场为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]
 LU Xu,LIAN Lingyu,SUN Zhanbo,et al.The Renewal of the Lost Spaces in Historical Blocks Based on Urban Acupuncture Theory: Taking Shenyang Beishi Market as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(12):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-06