[1]王箬雨,黄 鹤,张 璐.北京老城历史文化街区保护更新中的产权流通模式探讨[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):28-35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.004]
　WANG Ruoyu,HUANG He,ZHANG Lu.A Study on Property Rights Circulation Models in the Conservation and Regeneration of Historic Areas in Beijing Old City[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(2):28-35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.004]
点击复制

北京老城历史文化街区保护更新中的产权流通模式探讨()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年2期
页码:
28-35
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on Property Rights Circulation Models in the Conservation and Regeneration of Historic Areas in Beijing Old City
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）002-0028-08
作者:
王箬雨; 黄 鹤; 张 璐
王箬雨，清华大学建筑学院博士研究生；黄 鹤（通信作者），清华大学建筑学院副教授，博士生导师；张 璐，清华大学建筑学院博士研究生。
Author(s):
WANG Ruoyu; HUANG He; ZHANG Lu
关键词:
产权制度; 历史街区; 政府主导; 经济测算
Keywords:
land property rights; historic areas; government leadership; economic results calculation
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史文化街区的保护更新日益受到重视。北京老城历史文化街区具有突出的典型性和复杂性，在产权复杂背景下，政府类主体实施保护更新面临着成本回收周期长和经济不可持续等问题。立足北京历史文化街区的特定情况，提出基于土地物权的产权权利束梯度化流通策略，并以北京南新华街历史文化街区中的某地块为例，开展多情景模拟测算，展现产权权利束梯度化流通策略下政府类主体（特别是国有企业）推动历史文化街区保护更新的资金平衡条件。研究揭示土地物权关系作为制度建构的核心，对社会主体关系和空间资源分配产生影响。在北京老城历史文化街区中，完善政府与市场的协同机制是提高经济可持续性和促进社会价值与经济价值双重提升的关键。
Abstract:
Against the background of urban regeneration, the conservation and regeneration of historic areas have gained increasing attention. The historic areas of Beijing Old City exhibit pronounced typicality and complexity, and under the context of property rights, government entities face challenges such as long cost recovery cycles and economic unsustainability. Based on the specific institutional and spatial conditions of Beijing Old City, this study proposes a tiered circulation strategy of property rights bundles grounded in land ownership. Through a representative site within the South Xinhua Street historic area as a case study, a series of multi- scenario simulations are conducted to reveal the financial balance conditions for conservation and adaptive reuse led by government entities (especially state-woned enterprises) under this strategy. The study identifies land property rights as the institutional core, shaping the interactions among social stakeholders and the allocation of spatial resources. In the historic areas of Beijing Old City, improving the coordination mechanism between governmental and market entities is crucial to enhancing economic sustainability and achieving both social and economic value.

相似文献/References:

[1]滕有平.江南城市历史街区空间生产策略研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):39.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(2):39.
[2]薛名辉,万子祎,李佳.城市历史街区公共空间更新的新文旅视角与新赋能机制——以哈尔滨市为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
　XUE Minghui,WAN Ziyi,LI Jia.New Cultural Tourism Perspective and New Enabling Mechanism of Urban Historic Blocks Public Space Renewal[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
[3]项振海,李青,班鹏飞,等.历史街区中人群活动偏好的主体差异及其影响因素——以昆明市文明街历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
　XIANG Zhenhai,LI Qing,BAN Pengfei,et al.Subject Differences and Influencing Factors of Crowd Activity Preferences in Historic Districts：a Case Study of Wenming Street Historic District in Kunming City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):86.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.010]
[4]孙磊磊,徐泽华,秦英斌,等.“访客”模式下历史街区旅居空间设计研究——以苏州平江路大新桥巷25—27号地块为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
　SUN Leilei,XU Zehua,QIN Yingbin,et al.Research on the Design of Touristic Space in Historic District under the Guidance of Visitor：a Case Study of Daxinqiao Lane 25-27 in Suzhou Pingjiang Road[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.006]
[5]周 红,敖天姣.基于老年友好的历史街区生活性街道边缘空间重构——以湘潭市通济门片区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(4):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
　ZHOU Hong,AO Tianjiao.Research on Reconstruction Design of Living Street Edge Space in Historical Blocks from the Perspective of Age-Friendliness: A Case Study of Xiangtan Tongjimen Area[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):22.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.004.003]
[6]左 力,时钰琳.纽约开发权转移政策与建成遗产保护更新研究——以高线公园为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(12):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
　ZUO Li,SHI Yulin.Research on the Transfer of Development Rights and the Preservation and Renewal of Built Heritage in New York: A Case Study of the High Line Park[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.012.006]
[7]王中德,刘淑清.空间正义失范与重申——基于城市权利的历史街区更新路径重构[J].中国名城,2024,38(9):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
　WANG Zhongde,LIU Shuqing.Spatial Justice Disorder and Revitalization: Reframing the Renewal Path of Historic Districts Based on the Right to the City[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.009.002]
[8]路 旭,连羚毓,孙湛博,等.基于城市针灸理论的历史街区失落空间更新——以沈阳北市场为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]
　LU Xu,LIAN Lingyu,SUN Zhanbo,et al.The Renewal of the Lost Spaces in Historical Blocks Based on Urban Acupuncture Theory: Taking Shenyang Beishi Market as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.002]
[9]李和平,王雨晗.社区参与测度下的历史街区保护发展研究——以重庆市磁器口历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
　LI Heping,WANG Yuhan.Research on the Protection and Development of Historic Districts under the Measurement of Community Participation: A Case Study of the Ciqikou Historic District in Chongqing[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.001]
[10]潘鹏程.国土空间规划体系下历史街区保护规划三性研究——以南京秦淮区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):72.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.010]
　PAN Pengcheng.Research on the Three Characteristics of Historical Block Protection Planning under the National Land Space Planning System: Taking Qinhuai District in Nanjing as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):72.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.010]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-02-24