[1]刘涛,钱钰.大运河河南段的水运交通与文化创造[J].中国名城,2020,(10):86-90.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(10):86-90.
点击复制

大运河河南段的水运交通与文化创造()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
期数:
2020年10期
页码:
86-90
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-10-05

文章信息/Info

作者:
刘涛; 钱钰
刘 涛，河南大学文化产业与旅游管理学院副教授、文化产业管理系主任。
钱 钰，南京林业大学人文社会科学学院助教。
关键词:
大运河; 河南; 水运交通; 文化创造
Keywords:
the Grand Canal; Henan province; water transportation; cultural creation
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史上，大运河是河南文化发展的重要推动力。大运河与黄河在河南有着十分密切的联系，妥善处理黄运关系成为历代政府治理大运河的要务。大运河与河南天然水系相互交织，共同构建出一个四通八达的水运交通网，促使河南成为沟通四方、转输天下的重要中心枢纽。至唐宋时期，洛阳、开封、郑州、商丘等城市成为大运河的重要节点，发展出繁荣灿烂的河南都市文化。大运河与丝绸之路在河南联通衔接，吸引了来自国内外的多元文化在河南汇聚融合，使河南成为四方通衢和文明交汇的重要文化区域。
Abstract:
Historically, the Grand Canal was an important driving force for the cultural development of Henan province. The Grand Canal was closely connected with the Yellow River, and proper handling of the relationship between the Yellow River and the Grand Canal became the top priority for governments of all dynasties to govern the Grand Canal. The Grand Canal and the natural water system of Henan are interwoven together to build a water transportation network that extends in all directions, making Henan to become an important central hub that connects all directions and transfers the whole world. Until the Tang and Song dynasties, Luoyang, Kaifeng, Zhengzhou, Shangqiu and other cities were important nodes of the Grand Canal and developed a prosperous urban culture of Henan province. The confluence of the Grand Canal and the Silk Road in Henan led to the convergence of diverse cultures at home and abroad, and Henan became a important cultural area where has convenient transportation and intersecting civilization.

相似文献/References:

[1]唐慧超,洪 泉,胡海琦.运河文化的公众认知与感知研究——以大运河杭州拱墅段公共空间为例[J].中国名城,2020,(07):86.
[2]王 晓.杭州市大运河国家文化公园建设研究[J].中国名城,2020,(11):89.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(10):89.
[3]王为国,吴永发.京杭大运河对苏州人居环境的影响研究[J].中国名城,2020,(12):80.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(10):80.
[4]姜师立.大运河历史文脉与国家形象文化基因研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):85.
　JIANG Shili.Research on the Cultural Genes of the Grand Canal Historical Lineage and National Image[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):85.
[5]刘雨平.大运河遗产区域化保护规划探讨——以扬州为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):89.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.013]
　LIU Yuping.Discussion on Regionalized Protection Planning of the Grand Canal Heritage: Taking Yangzhou as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):89.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.013]
[6]马仁锋,李秋秋,周小靖.中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
　MA Renfeng,LI Qiuqiu,ZHOU Xiaojing.Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China：Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
[7]朱明松,宋桂杰,黄杰.2022“运河遗产与致富河、幸福河”学术研讨会综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]
　ZHU Mingsong,SONG Guijie,HUANG Jie.Summary of the 2022 Symposium on the Grand Canal Heritage and the River of Prosperity and Happiness[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]
[8]戴俊骋,刘方宇.线性文化遗产价值评估模型的构建研究——以中国大运河为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.012]
　DAI Juncheng,LIU Fangyu.Research on the Construction of Linear Cultural Heritage Value Evaluation Model：A Case Study of the Grand Canal of China[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.012]
[9]田德新,张 蝶.中国大运河文化带研究综述[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.012]
　TIAN Dexin,ZHANG Die.A Review of the Domestic Researches on the Grand Canal Cultural Belt[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.012]
[10]石铭,许应石.城市建设与地质环境协调发展策略——以江苏扬州为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):60.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.008]
　SHI Ming,XU Yingshi.Coordinated Development Strategy Between Urban Construction and Geological Environment: Taking Yangzhou, Jiangsu as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):60.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.008]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-05