[1]马仁锋,李秋秋,周小靖.中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
 MA Renfeng,LI Qiuqiu,ZHOU Xiaojing.Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China:Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
点击复制

中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
36
期数:
2022年6期
页码:
88-96
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China:Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research
文章编号:
1674-4144(2022)06-0088-09
作者:
马仁锋李秋秋周小靖
马仁锋,宁波大学地理科学与旅游文化学院教授,博士;李秋秋,国家发展和改革委员会创新驱动发展中心(数字经济研究发展中心)研究实习员,博士;周小靖,浙江大学城乡规划设计研究院规划师。
Author(s):
MA RenfengLI QiuqiuZHOU Xiaojing
关键词:
大运河文化遗产保护地方政策
Keywords:
Grand Canalcultural heritageconservationlocal policye
分类号:
G122;TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
梳理学界大运河申遗成功前后的保护利用研究热点,诠释大运河遗产保护实践新动向。政策实践梳理表明申遗成功前大运河研究侧重城市建成区遗迹保护与利用,申遗成功后大运河研究从运河本身转向大运河衍生文化及文旅融合推进、大运河遗产构成及遗产价值、遗产保护利用模式、保护法律法规及大运河文化带建设等方面,进而指出基于总体保护框架探索各河段的地方性,实现大运河遗产保护政策实践、居民社群与文脉认同的共生关系成为未来研究重点。
Abstract:
With the successful application of the Grand Canal as a world cultural heritage in 2014, the protection and utilization of the Grand Canal has become a new research hotspot.Before applying for the world cultural heritage, the protection of the Grand Canal focus on the protection and utilization of the ruins within the urban built areas,after 2014, the study of the Grand Canal shifted from the canal itself to culture derived from the Grand Canal and the integration of culture and tourism, and explored the composition and value of the Grand Canal heritage, the mode of heritage protection and utilization, the protection of laws and regulations and the construction of the Grand Canal cultural belt.Exploring local characteristics within different areas on the basis of overall protection,links the grand Canal between history, culture and participating social groups,and based on the enlightenment of foreign canal research,the future protection, inheritance and utilization of the Grand Canal are prospected.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁浩翰,覃锐钧,雷蒙·刘.港式茶餐厅的转型:从日常茶歇到怀旧情怀[J].中国名城,2020,(07):17.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):17.
[2]唐慧超,洪 泉,胡海琦.运河文化的公众认知与感知研究——以大运河杭州拱墅段公共空间为例[J].中国名城,2020,(07):86.
[3]刘涛,钱钰.大运河河南段的水运交通与文化创造[J].中国名城,2020,(10):86.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):86.
[4]王 晓.杭州市大运河国家文化公园建设研究[J].中国名城,2020,(11):89.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):89.
[5]王为国,吴永发.京杭大运河对苏州人居环境的影响研究[J].中国名城,2020,(12):80.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):80.
[6]姜师立.大运河历史文脉与国家形象文化基因研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):85.
 JIANG Shili.Research on the Cultural Genes of the Grand Canal Historical Lineage and National Image[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):85.
[7]刘雨平.大运河遗产区域化保护规划探讨——以扬州为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):89.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.013]
 LIU Yuping.Discussion on Regionalized Protection Planning of the Grand Canal Heritage: Taking Yangzhou as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):89.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.013]
[8]潘一婷.去殖民化与土著化:加拿大土著建筑遗产保护的探索之路[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
 PAN Yiting.Decolonization and Indigenization:Exploring the Paths of Indigenous Architectural Heritage Conservation in Canada[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
[9]衣霄翔,于帅.文化导向的收缩城市复兴策略——英国利物浦经验及启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
 YI Xiaoxiang,YU Shuai.Culturally Oriented Shrinking Urban Regeneration Strategies——The Experience and Inspiration of Liverpool,UK[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
[10]朱明松,宋桂杰,黄杰.2022“运河遗产与致富河、幸福河”学术研讨会综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]
 ZHU Mingsong,SONG Guijie,HUANG Jie.Summary of the 2022 Symposium on the Grand Canal Heritage and the River of Prosperity and Happiness[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-13