[1]茹 彤,董 钰,关 星,等.西安历史文化名城立法保护实践研究[J].中国名城,2026,40(3):44-50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.003.006]
　RU Tong,DONG Yu,GUAN Xin,et al.Research on the Protection of Local Legislation in Xi’an Historical and Cultural City[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(3):44-50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.003.006]
点击复制

西安历史文化名城立法保护实践研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年3期
页码:
44-50
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Protection of Local Legislation in Xi’an Historical and Cultural City
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）003-0044-07
作者:
茹 彤; 董 钰; 关 星; 姜 岩
茹 彤，西安市城市规划设计研究院历史文化名城分院规划师，工程师；董 钰（通信作者），西安市城市规划设计研究院历史文化名城分院总工程师，高级工程师；关 星，西安市城市规划设计研究院历史文化名城分院规划师，注册城乡规划师；姜 岩，西安市城市规划设计研究院历史文化名城分院院长，正高级工程师。
Author(s):
RU Tong; DONG Yu; GUAN Xin; JIANG Yan
关键词:
历史文化名城; 立法理念; 协同治理; 地方立法; 西安
Keywords:
historic and cultural cities; legislative concept; synergistic governance; local legislation; Xi’an City
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.003.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
立法保护是历史文化名城守护文化根脉、实现可持续发展的制度基石与刚性支撑。《西安历史文化名城保护条例》的修订实施，为西安名城保护筑牢法治基础，推动保护工作实现从“经验治理”向“制度治理”的关键转变。在立法理念上深度融合系统性保护、活态传承与协同治理理念，既坚守遗产真实性与完整性底线，又注重平衡保护与城市发展的关系，实现从“单一管控”向“协同治理”的转变。作为历史文化名城保护地方立法，主要有三方面亮点：一是拓展完善法定保护对象体系，建立健全保护管理制度；二是立足西安城市文脉和资源特征，突出强化西安名城保护重点和特色；三是总结固化实践经验措施，鼓励支持保护对象有序开放，强化文化遗产的传承利用。
Abstract:
Legislative protection serves as the institutional cornerstone and rigid support for safeguarding cultural roots and achieving sustainable development in historic and cultural cities. The revision and implementation of the Xi’an Historic and Cultural City Protection Regulation has established a legal framework for preserving heritage, promoting a crucial shift in conservation from experience-based governance to institutional governance. The legislation deeply integrates systematic protection, living heritage transmission, and collaborative governance concepts to realize the transition from single control to collaborative governance, which not only uphold the authenticity and integrity of cultural heritages but also balance the preservation with urban development. As a local legislation for historic city protection, it highlights three features, namely, expanding and refining the statutory protection object system to establish comprehensive management mechanisms; emphasizing unique cultural context and resource characteristics to strengthen its distinctive protection priorities; consolidating practical measures to encourage orderly public access to protected sites and enhance the inheritance and utilization of cultural heritage.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾 真,向 澍.历史文化名城保护的得与失——以重庆名城保护实践为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.005]
　ZENG Zhen,XIANG Shu.Gains and Losses of Historic Cities Conservation：a Case Study of Chongqings Conservation Practices[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(3):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.005]
[2]张 松.国家历史文化名城保护立法进程与未来展望[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
　ZHANG Song.The Legislative Process and Future Prospects of the National Historic and Cultural Cities Conservation[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
[3]党安荣,胡 海,李翔宇,等.中国历史文化名城保护的信息化发展历程与展望[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.006]
　DANG Anrong,HU Hai,LI Xiangyu,et al.Advancement and Prospect of Informatized Conservation of Historic Cities in China[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.006]
[4]邵 典,杨俊宴.城市空间形态的多骨架体系叠合解析[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):71.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.010]
　SHAO Dian,YANG Junyan.Analysis on the Superposition of Multi Skeleton System of Urban Spatial Form[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):71.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.010]
[5]王小斌,刘峻君,刘翔宇.城市历史文化街区的空间调查与活化利用途径探析——以绍兴鲁迅故里历史文化街区、八字桥历史文化街区为主例[J].中国名城,2021,(02):72.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(3):72.
[6]张广汉,陈伯安.历史城市保护的中国经验——历史文化名城制度40年[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.001]
　ZHANG Guanghan,CHEN Boan.The Chinese Experience of Historic City Protection：Forty Years of Historical and Cultural City System[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.001]
[7]刘仁义,辛 会,卢俊超.共生视角下名城建设控制区街道提升策略研究——以黟县碧阳大道示范段为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):44.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.006]
　LIU Renyi,XIN Hui,LU Junchao.Study on Street Enhancement Strategies of the Famous City Construction Control Area from the Perspective of Symbiosis：Taking the Demonstration Section of Biyang Avenue in Yixian County as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):44.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.006]
[8]周国艳,朱佳,丁仲元.基于居民体育健身需求的名城老旧住区更新对策研究——以苏州市姑苏区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(7):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.011]
　ZHOU Guoyan,ZHU Jia,DING Zhongyuan.A Research on the Renewal Countermeasures for Old Residential Areas in Historical Famous Cities Based on Residents’ Demand for Physical Fitness: Taking Gusu District, Suzhou City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.011]
[9]张若曦,吴灈杭,林怡.历史文化名城保护立法的责—权—利关系研究——以《泉州市历史文化名城保护条例》制定为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(7):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.013]
　ZHANG Ruoxi,WU Quhang,LIN Yi.The Research of Responsibility-Power-Interest Relationship in the Legislation on Historic and Cultural City Conservation: An Example of the Ordinance Formulation on Quanzhou Historic and Cultural City Conservation[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.013]
[10]龙小凤,姜 岩,董 钰,等.系统性视角下的历史文化名城保护传承路径研究——以西安为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(10):21.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.003]
　LONG Xiaofeng,JIANG Yan,DONG Yu,et al.Research on the Protection and Inheritance Path of Historic and Cultural City From the Systematic Perspective: Taking Xi ’an as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):21.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-07