[1]曹志刚,许静静.城市社区空间转换与公共性构建——WS小区个案研究[J].中国名城,2025,39(7):12-20.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.007.002]
　CAO Zhigang,XU Jingjing.Spatial Transformation and the Construction of Publicness in Urban Communities: A Case Study of WS Residential Neighborhood[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(7):12-20.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.007.002]
点击复制

城市社区空间转换与公共性构建——WS小区个案研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年7期
页码:
12-20
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Transformation and the Construction of Publicness in Urban Communities: A Case Study of WS Residential Neighborhood
文章编号:
1674-4144（2025）007-0012-09
作者:
曹志刚; 许静静
曹志刚，华中科技大学社会学院副院长，教授，博士生导师，博士；许静静，华中科技大学新闻学院助教。
Author(s):
CAO Zhigang; XU Jingjing
关键词:
城市社区; 公共空间; 空间转换; 公共性
Keywords:
urban community; public space; spatial transformation; publicness
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.007.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的时代大背景下，探索并凝练城市基层社会治理的能力提升路径尤为重要且紧迫。从空间治理的视角出发，对碎片化的公共空间格局进行修补，为其培育社区公共性内涵，进而延缓并逆转社区公共生活的衰落，可以成为当前城市社区治理水平提升的核心路径之一。对社区公共性内涵进行剖析，以WS老旧小区为研究案例，将其空间转换过程分为3个阶段：空间修复、空间营造、空间弥合，分析不同阶段社区公共性呈现的不同层次和核心特征。研究发现，空间修复阶段以公共事务来促进公共互动；空间营造阶段以空间实践和参与来发展居民公共生活；空间弥合阶段以空间自治来提升公共价值。高层次公共性的形成有赖于低层次公共性所诞生的能力与表达。现实中城市社区空间转换的不同阶段与公共性的不同层次之间，并非完全体现为线性或非此即彼的关系，它们之间的复杂关系恰恰映射了“空间视角”在理解及干预当前城市社区治理中的价值。
Abstract:
Under the grand context of advancing the modernization of China’s governance system and governance capacity, it is particularly critical and urgent to explore and refine pathways for enhancing urban grassroots social governance. From the perspective of spatial governance, repairing fragmented public spatial structures, fostering community publicness, and thereby delaying and reversing the decline of communal public life can serve as a core pathway to elevate contemporary urban community governance. Building on this perspective, this study dissects the concept of community publicness and adopts WS, an aging residential neighborhood, as a case study. It divides its spatial transformation process into three phases: spatial remediation, spatial cultivation, and spatial reconciliation, analyzing the distinct levels and core characteristics of publicness manifested at each stage. The findings reveal that the spatial remediation phase promotes public interaction through collective affairs, that the spatial cultivation phase develops residents’ communal life via spatial practices and participatory engagement, and that the spatial reconciliation phase elevates public value through spatial self-governance. The formation of higher-level publicness depends on capacities and expressions emerging from lower-level publicness. Importantly, the study highlights that the relationship between spatial transformation phases and publicness levels in real-world urban communities is neither strictly linear nor mutually exclusive. Their intricate interplay precisely reflects the value of the perspective of spatial governance both in understanding and intervening in contemporary urban community governance

相似文献/References:

[1]唐慧超,洪 泉,胡海琦.运河文化的公众认知与感知研究——以大运河杭州拱墅段公共空间为例[J].中国名城,2020,(07):86.
[2]姚 栋,桑铖卓,秦志宇.文化活动视角下商业综合体公共空间活力研究——基于瑞虹天地月亮湾室外广场的行为学调查[J].中国名城,2020,(11):19.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(7):19.
[3]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[4]王世军,华夏.历史文化遗产再利用与城市公共空间营造——以上海为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.001]
　WANG Shijun,HUA Xia.The Historical and Cultural Heritage for Urban Public Space：The Case of Shanghai[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.001]
[5]程超,黄志毅,张致伟.居民自治视角下老旧社区公共空间体系建构——基于武汉市楚宝里片区的实证研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.008]
　CHENG Chao,HUANG Zhiyi,ZHANG Zhiwei.The Construction of the Old Community Public Space System from the Perspective of Residents Autonomy：Based on the Empirical Research of Chubaoli Area in Wuhan[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.008]
[6]薛名辉,万子祎,李佳.城市历史街区公共空间更新的新文旅视角与新赋能机制——以哈尔滨市为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
　XUE Minghui,WAN Ziyi,LI Jia.New Cultural Tourism Perspective and New Enabling Mechanism of Urban Historic Blocks Public Space Renewal[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.004]
[7]汤寿旎,杨蕙祯,吕林冰,等.超大城市中的公共空间生活意象——夜市从纯商业向文创活力方向发展研究[J].中国名城,2021,(02):58.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(7):58.
[8]魏宗财,杜 宇,彭长歆.21世纪以来城市社区营造模式研究进展[J].中国名城,2025,39(6):59.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.006.009]
　WEI Zongcai,DU Yu,PENG Changxin.Research Progress in Urban Community Building Modes Since the 21st Century[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(7):59.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.006.009]
[9]王洪羿,魏盈盈.代际融合视角下基于老幼行为活动的住区公共空间优化研究——以苏州市阳光城小区为例[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.011]
　WANG Hongyi,WEI Yingying.Research on the Optimization of Residential Public Spaces Based on Behavioral Activities of the Elderly and Children from an Intergenerational Integration Perspective: A Case Study of Sunshine City Community in Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(7):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-07-10