[1]田德新,顾正晴.中国大运河文化遗产保护管理中公共参与的北美经验借鉴[J].中国名城,2023,37(9):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.013]
　TIAN Dexin,GU Zhengqing.A Study on the Public Involvement in the Conservation and Management of the Cultural Heritage of the Grand Canal of China and the Experience of North America[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.013]
点击复制

中国大运河文化遗产保护管理中公共参与的北美经验借鉴()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
37
期数:
2023年9期
页码:
88-96
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Public Involvement in the Conservation and Management of the Cultural Heritage of the Grand Canal of China and the Experience of North America
文章编号:
1674-4144（2023）009-0088-09
作者:
田德新; 顾正晴
田德新，扬州大学中国大运河研究院研究员，扬州大学外国语学院特聘教授，博士生导师；顾正晴，扬州大学外国语学院博士生。
Author(s):
TIAN Dexin; GU Zhengqing
关键词:
公众参与; 文化遗产的保护管理; 大运河; 里多运河; 伊利运河
Keywords:
public involvement; conservation and management of cultural heritage; the Grand Canal of China; Rideau Canal; Erie Canal
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
梳理中国大运河（简称“大运河”）文化遗产构成、内涵与特点，厘清在其保护管理中的瓶颈问题。针对存在的问题，以公众参与为理论视角，从主体、理念、内容与视域4个维度探究美国、加拿大运河保护管理中可资中国借鉴的经验与启示。研究发现，大运河文化遗产丰富多样，文化内涵博大精深，遗产特点鲜明独特，具有多重重大意义，然而相关保护管理政策与实施举措大多属于政府行为，自上而下的单向管理色彩浓厚，缺乏广泛而系统的民间公众参与。美国、加拿大的主要经验是：第一，公众参与主体由遗产廊道居民、非政府组织、非营利企业、民间力量以及游客和个体志愿者组成；第二，双方坚信广泛的公共参与是文化遗产保护管理成功的原动力，有助于发挥教育的功能，有利于国民身份的塑造；第三，公众参与贯穿其遗产廊道项目管理计划的起草、修改、实施、评估等全过程；最后，充分利用网络主页、数据库、模拟研讨以及脸书、推特、照片墙等现代信息技术与社交媒介，以促使公众参与事半功倍。基于此，提出三条建议，供国内大运河文化遗产保护管理参考借鉴。
Abstract:
While combing the composition, connotation and characteristics of the cultural heritage of the Grand Canal of China (hereinafter referred to as the Grand Canal), we have clarified the bottleneck problems in its conservation and management. To deal with the said problems, this paper explores the experience and enlightenment that China can learn from the protection and management of the U.S. and Canada from the perspective of public participation in terms of such dimensions as subject, concept, content, and perspective. The study has found that the cultural heritage of the Grand Canal of China is rich and diverse, its cultural connotation is broad and profound, and its heritage features are distinctive and unique, with multiple significant meanings. However, most of the relevant conservation and management policies and implementation measures are government actions, and the top-down one-way management is obvious, lacking extensive and systematic civil public involvement. The relevant experience of the US and Canada is as follows: first, the main body of public involvement consists of residents of the heritage corridor, non-governmental organizations, non-profit enterprises, private forces, tourists and individual volunteers; second, both sides firmly believe that extensive public involvement is the driving force for the success of cultural heritage conservation and management, which is conducive to giving play to the function of education and shaping of national identity; third, public involvement runs through the whole process of drafting, revising, implementing and evaluating the heritage corridor project management plan of both sides; finally, both sides have been making full use of modern information technology and social media, such as web homepage, database, virtual discussion, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to promote public involvement, yielding twice the result with half the effort. Based on this, three suggestions are put forward for reference in the conservation and management of the cultural heritage of the Grand Canal of China.

相似文献/References:

[1]李锦伟,涂彦珣,危小建,等.公众参与视角下文化遗产景观保护与利用——以景德镇御窑遗址及周边历史街区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(12):39.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.006]
　LI Jinwei,TU Yanxun,WEI Xiaojian,et al.Protection and Utilization of Cultural Heritage Landscape through Public Participation: A Case Study on Jingdezhen Imperial Kiln Site and Surrounding Historical Districts[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(9):39.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.012.006]
[2]李宏志,林 全,李桂欣.“五全保护”理念下历史文化名城保护规划编制探索——以韶关为例[J].中国名城,2025,39(2):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.002.004]
　LI Hongzhi,LIN Quan,LI Guixin.Exploration of the Protection Planning of Historical and Cultural Cities Under the Concept of "Five Full Protection": A Case Study of Shaoguan[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(9):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.002.004]
[3]王宾波,张久东,程媛媛.可持续城市更新：内涵、实践与挑战[J].中国名城,2025,39(10):9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.002]
　WANG Binbo,ZHANG Jiudong,CHENG Yuanyuan.Sustainable Urban Renewal：Connotation，Practice and Challenges[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(9):9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.002]
[4]陈 瑜,徐小湾.从问卷调查到沉浸体验：共生视角下城市更新公众参与技术的范式转变[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):18.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.003]
　CHEN Yu,XU Xiaowan.From Questionnaires to Immersive Experience: the Paradigm Shift of Public Participation Technologies in Urban Renewal from a Symbiotic Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(9):18.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.003]
[5]陈 曦,宋艳琦,袁 荃.城市更新语境中协同共治的公众参与模式研究——以苏州为例[J].中国名城,2026,40(3):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.003.004]
　CHEN Xi,SONG Yanqi,YUAN Quan.Study on Public Participation Models of Collaborative Governance in the Context of Urban Renewal: A Case Study of Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(9):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.003.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-07