[1]史承勇,李晓斌,杨 乔,等.生态博物馆建设适宜性评价指标体系研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(9):30-36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.005]
　SHI Chengyong,LI Xiaobin,YANG Qiao,et al.Research on Evaluation Index System of Suitability for Eco-Museum Construction[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):30-36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.005]
点击复制

生态博物馆建设适宜性评价指标体系研究()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
37
期数:
2023年9期
页码:
30-36
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Evaluation Index System of Suitability for Eco-Museum Construction
文章编号:
1674-4144（2023）009-0030-07
作者:
史承勇; 李晓斌; 杨 乔; 杜怡帆; 陈 兢
史承勇，西北农林科技大学风景园林艺术学院副教授；李晓斌，西北农林科技大学风景园林艺术学院硕士研究生；杨乔，西北农林科技大学风景园林艺术学院硕士研究生；杜怡帆，西北农林科技大学风景园林艺术学院硕士研究生；陈 兢，圣彼得堡国立大学哲学院博士研究生。
Author(s):
SHI Chengyong; LI Xiaobin; YANG Qiao; DU Yifan; CHEN Jing
关键词:
生态博物馆; 文化遗产; 适宜性; 层次分析法; 评价指标体系
Keywords:
eco-museums;  suitability;  cultural heritage;  analytic hierarchy process;  assessment index system
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
世界范围内建有约400座生态博物馆，但其建设适宜性评价指标体系尚未形成共识。因此，研究在既有成果基础之上，综合运用理论研究法、频度分析法、头脑风暴法、德尔菲法（Delphi）和层次分析法（AHP）构建了“EHRS”生态博物馆建设适宜性评价指标体系。结果显示：（1）该评价体系包含了4项准则层（B1—B4）、11项指标因子（C1—C11）。（2）“文化遗产”是生态博物馆建设的必要条件，“社区居民”是生态博物馆建设的核心条件，“自然生态”是生态博物馆建设的基础条件，“社会保障”是生态博物馆建设的一般条件。（3）评价一个地区是否具备建设生态博物馆的条件时，应首先评价该地的“民族风俗习惯活态性”，其次为“传统技艺独特性与完整性”，最后为“民众意愿与需求度”。研究成果为后续生态博物馆建设提供参考和借鉴。
Abstract:
There are about 400 eco-museums built around the world, but there is no consensus on their construction adaptability evaluation system. In that case, this dissertation aims to construct a suitability assessment index system for the construction of EHRS eco-museums based on the existing researching findings of eco-museums by comprehensively utilizing the theoretical research method, the frequency analysis method, the brainstorming method, the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). As can be seen from the results,(i)The assessment system is composed of 4 criterion levels (ranging from B1 to B4) and 11 index factors (ranging from C1 to C11). (ii)"Cultural heritage" is a prerequisite for eco-museum construction; "community resident" is an essential element for eco-museum construction; "natural ecology" is basic for eco-museum construction; and "social security" is a general condition for eco-museum construction. (iii) The "dynamics of ethnic customs and habits" should be evaluated first, followed by "the uniqueness and completeness of traditional customs and habits", and then "the public’s willingness and demands" . The study provides a reference basis and inspiration for the subsequent construction of eco-museums on the premise of making up for the gap with respect to the evaluation of the suitability of eco-museum construction.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁浩翰,覃锐钧,雷蒙·刘.港式茶餐厅的转型：从日常茶歇到怀旧情怀[J].中国名城,2020,(07):17.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):17.
[2]潘一婷.去殖民化与土著化：加拿大土著建筑遗产保护的探索之路[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
　PAN Yiting.Decolonization and Indigenization：Exploring the Paths of Indigenous Architectural Heritage Conservation in Canada[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
[3]马仁锋,李秋秋,周小靖.中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
　MA Renfeng,LI Qiuqiu,ZHOU Xiaojing.Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China：Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
[4]衣霄翔,于帅.文化导向的收缩城市复兴策略——英国利物浦经验及启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
　YI Xiaoxiang,YU Shuai.Culturally Oriented Shrinking Urban Regeneration Strategies——The Experience and Inspiration of Liverpool，UK[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
[5]杨国安,王小舟.世界遗产入选标准的特征及其对我国申报工作的启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
　YANG Guoan,WANG Xiaozhou.The Characteric of World Heritage Inclusion Criterion and Its Enlightenment to China’s Application for World Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
[6]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[7]王月伦,阮项.城市废墟遗产的价值与保护研究[J].中国名城,2021,(02):87.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(9):87.
[8]王运良.文化遗产旅游开发与提升要素研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
　WANG Yunliang.Research on Elements of Cultural Heritage Tourism Development and Promotion[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
[9]南剑飞.我国地名文化遗产保护名录制度建设之改进对策研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
　NAN Jianfei.Study on the Improvement Path of the System Construction for China Geographical Names Cultural Heritage Protection Lists[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
[10]耿健,胡敏,陈双辰.农耕文化景观的文化内涵与保护研究——以莆田兴化平原洋田为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]
　GENG Jian,HU Min,CHEN Shuangchen.Research on the Cultural Connotation and Protection of Agricultural Cultural Landscape: Taking Plain Yangtian in Xinghua, Putian as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-07