[1]徐振强 李有增 董振国 杨 鹏 刘元晨.基于智慧城市思维构建青年发展型城市评价体系[J].中国名城,2020,(08):20-26.
点击复制

基于智慧城市思维构建青年发展型城市评价体系()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
期数:
2020年08期
页码:
20-26
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-08-05

文章信息/Info

作者:
徐振强 李有增 董振国 杨 鹏 刘元晨
徐振强，全国市长研修学院副研究员，博士。
李有增，首都师范大学副校长。
董振国，河北省电子政务学会创始人FEO，河北省促进智慧城市健康发展专家咨询委员会副主任。
杨 鹏，深圳市海外留学归国人员协会会长。
刘元晨，武汉工程大学教学信息中心国际学院分中心主任。
关键词:
青年发展; 城市; 评价; 体系
Keywords:
youth development ;  city ;  evaluation ;  system
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国青年人口基数约为4.33亿，占全国总人口约1/3，占流动人口过半。在总体人口老龄化的同时，深圳等代表性城市（粤港澳、长三角等区域）青年人口仍实现了净流入。2017年4月《中长期青年发展规划（2016-2025年）》，是我国第一次从国家层面形成较为完整的青年发展政策体系，截至2019年底，所有省级单位完成本区域相应的发展规划并发布。从城市尺度探讨适应青年发展的评价体系，有助于上位规划在地方精准有效落地和高质量实施。梳理了青年人口区域间变化的总体态势、青年发展的主要问题的维度、地方促进青年发展的已有实践以及国内外相关的测评体系，基于智慧城市思维，初步构建宜居、宜业、宜学、高效服务和青年满意五个维度26个三级指标的评价体系，并从数字化平台、大数据驱动和落地实施保障等维度提出总体架构，为实施青年发展型城市的测评提供工具支持。
Abstract:
The number of China’s youth population is about 433 million, accounting for about 1 / 3 of the total population. It also accounts for more than half of the floating population. While the overall population is aging, the youth population in representative cities such as Shenzhen (Guangdong, Hong Kong, Macao, Yangtze River Delta and other regions) has still achieved a net inflow. The medium and long term youth development plan (2016-2025) in April 2017 is the first time that China has formed a relatively complete youth development policy system at the national level. By the end of 2019, all provincial units have completed and released the corresponding regional development plans, and discussed the evaluation system suitable for youth development from the urban scale, which is conducive to the accurate and effective implementation and high quality of the upper level planning implementation. This study combs the overall situation of regional changes in the youth population, the dimensions of the main problems of youth development, the existing practice of promoting youth development in local areas, and the relevant evaluation system at home and abroad. Based on the thinking of smart city, the evaluation system of 26 three-level indicators in five dimensions of livability, employment, education, efficient service and youth satisfaction is preliminarily constructed The overall framework is proposed from the dimensions of data-driven and landing implementation security, which provides tool support for the implementation of the evaluation of youth development oriented cities.

相似文献/References:

[1]周建高,王凌宇.基于土地利用结构调整的居住极限密集问题解决方法探讨[J].中国名城,2021,(01):47.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(08):47.
[2]杜 澍,周 君,赵 坤,等.中国城市文化空间研究的进展、趋势和应用建议[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):1.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.001]
　DU Shu,ZHOU Jun,ZHAO Kun,et al.The Research on Progress，Trend and Application Suggestion of Urban[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(08):1.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.001]
[3]周建高,汤晓冬.东京都轨道枢纽TOD建设与启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.004]
　ZHOU Jiangao,TANG Xiaodong.Rail Hub TOD Construction and Enlightenment of Tokyo[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(08):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.004]
[4]王世军,华夏.历史文化遗产再利用与城市公共空间营造——以上海为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.001]
　WANG Shijun,HUA Xia.The Historical and Cultural Heritage for Urban Public Space：The Case of Shanghai[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(08):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.001]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-18