[1]秦可馨,张 磊.基于“工具—目标—主体”三维框架的历史文化名城保护政策研究[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):50-58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.007]
　QIN Kexin,ZHANG Lei.A Study on the Protection Policies of Chinese Historical and Cultural Cities: A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework of "Tools, Objectives, and Subjects"[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(2):50-58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.007]
点击复制

基于“工具—目标—主体”三维框架的历史文化名城保护政策研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年2期
页码:
50-58
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Protection Policies of Chinese Historical and Cultural Cities: A Three-Dimensional Analytical Framework of "Tools, Objectives, and Subjects"
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）002-0050-09
作者:
秦可馨; 张 磊
秦可馨，中国人民大学公共管理学院博士研究生；张 磊，中国人民大学公共管理学院教授，国家治理工程学院副院长，博士。
Author(s):
QIN Kexin; ZHANG Lei
关键词:
历史文化名城; 政策文本分析; 政策工具; 居民认知
Keywords:
historical and cultural cities; policy content analysis; policy tools; residents’ cognition
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
市县国家历史文化名城颁布的历史文化名城保护条例是城乡建设中加强历史文化遗产保护传承的重要制度保障。基于政策工具视角，构建“政策工具—政策目标—政策主体”的三维分析框架，对75份国家级历史文化名城保护条例的政策文本进行单维度和多维交叉分析。发现市县颁布名城条例中的政策工具以环境型为主，政策目标侧重于历史文化传承，政策主体则以政府主导为主。在政策工具与政策目标维度中，传承优秀历史文化和促进历史文化遗产可持续发展的目标综合运用了供给型、需求型和环境型三类政策工具；在政策工具与政策主体二维分析中，政府、居民、企业及传承人综合运用了三类政策工具，科研机构和社会组织仅使用了需求型工具。当前我国市县颁布的历史文化名城条例，其政策工具结构显著失衡，在政策目标中缺乏活化利用，政策主体作用不足。应从调整政策工具结构、均衡政策目标配置、优化政策主体分布等三方面进行完善，从而促进各国家级历史文化名城条例编制质量的提升。
Abstract:
The protection regulations for national historic and cultural cities, enacted by cities and counties, serve as a vital institutional safeguard. They enhance the preservation and transmission of historical and cultural heritage in urban and rural development. These regulations also provide a key foundation for locally tailored conservation and use of historic cities, towns, districts, and buildings. However, there is still a lack of systematic analysis of such regulations from a public policy perspective. This study addresses this gap by creating a three-dimensional analytical framework: "Policy Tools - Policy Objectives - Policy Subjects." Using content analysis, we examine 75 policy texts of local regulations protecting national historic and cultural cities from both single-dimensional and multi-dimensional perspectives. The results show that current regulations mainly depend on environmental policy tools. Their policy goals mostly center on transmitting outstanding historical culture. Additionally, policy subjects are largely government-driven. Further analysis indicates that objectives such as cultural transmission and sustainable heritage development involve all three policy tools: supply-side, demand-side, and environmental. As for policy subjects, the government, residents, businesses, and inheritors use all three types of tools. In contrast, research institutions and social organizations rely only on demand-side tools. These local protection regulations face several problems: an overall imbalance in policy tool structure, a disproportionate focus on policy goals, and unequal distribution among policy subjects. To achieve comprehensive policy improvement, efforts should focus on three areas: adjusting the mix of policy tools, balancing policy objectives, and more effectively distributing policy responsibilities.

相似文献/References:

[1]曾 真,向 澍.历史文化名城保护的得与失——以重庆名城保护实践为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.005]
　ZENG Zhen,XIANG Shu.Gains and Losses of Historic Cities Conservation：a Case Study of Chongqings Conservation Practices[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):35.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.005]
[2]张 松.国家历史文化名城保护立法进程与未来展望[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
　ZHANG Song.The Legislative Process and Future Prospects of the National Historic and Cultural Cities Conservation[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
[3]党安荣,胡 海,李翔宇,等.中国历史文化名城保护的信息化发展历程与展望[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.006]
　DANG Anrong,HU Hai,LI Xiangyu,et al.Advancement and Prospect of Informatized Conservation of Historic Cities in China[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.006]
[4]邵 典,杨俊宴.城市空间形态的多骨架体系叠合解析[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):71.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.010]
　SHAO Dian,YANG Junyan.Analysis on the Superposition of Multi Skeleton System of Urban Spatial Form[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):71.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.010]
[5]王小斌,刘峻君,刘翔宇.城市历史文化街区的空间调查与活化利用途径探析——以绍兴鲁迅故里历史文化街区、八字桥历史文化街区为主例[J].中国名城,2021,(02):72.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(2):72.
[6]张广汉,陈伯安.历史城市保护的中国经验——历史文化名城制度40年[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.001]
　ZHANG Guanghan,CHEN Boan.The Chinese Experience of Historic City Protection：Forty Years of Historical and Cultural City System[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.001]
[7]刘仁义,辛 会,卢俊超.共生视角下名城建设控制区街道提升策略研究——以黟县碧阳大道示范段为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):44.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.006]
　LIU Renyi,XIN Hui,LU Junchao.Study on Street Enhancement Strategies of the Famous City Construction Control Area from the Perspective of Symbiosis：Taking the Demonstration Section of Biyang Avenue in Yixian County as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):44.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.006]
[8]周国艳,朱佳,丁仲元.基于居民体育健身需求的名城老旧住区更新对策研究——以苏州市姑苏区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(7):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.011]
　ZHOU Guoyan,ZHU Jia,DING Zhongyuan.A Research on the Renewal Countermeasures for Old Residential Areas in Historical Famous Cities Based on Residents’ Demand for Physical Fitness: Taking Gusu District, Suzhou City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.011]
[9]张若曦,吴灈杭,林怡.历史文化名城保护立法的责—权—利关系研究——以《泉州市历史文化名城保护条例》制定为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(7):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.013]
　ZHANG Ruoxi,WU Quhang,LIN Yi.The Research of Responsibility-Power-Interest Relationship in the Legislation on Historic and Cultural City Conservation: An Example of the Ordinance Formulation on Quanzhou Historic and Cultural City Conservation[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.013]
[10]龙小凤,姜 岩,董 钰,等.系统性视角下的历史文化名城保护传承路径研究——以西安为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(10):21.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.003]
　LONG Xiaofeng,JIANG Yan,DONG Yu,et al.Research on the Protection and Inheritance Path of Historic and Cultural City From the Systematic Perspective: Taking Xi ’an as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):21.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-03-02