[1]孙 琨,扬州大学长江文化研究院旅游烹饪学院教授,博士,等.功能协同视角下文化遗产的系统性保护传承[J].中国名城,2025,39(2):63-70.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.002.009]
　SUN Kun,HUANG Jie,Li Qing.The Systematic Protection and Inheritance of Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of Function Collaboration[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(2):63-70.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.002.009]
点击复制

功能协同视角下文化遗产的系统性保护传承()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年2期
页码:
63-70
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Systematic Protection and Inheritance of Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of Function Collaboration
文章编号:
1674-4144（2025）002-0063-08
作者:
孙 琨; 扬州大学长江文化研究院旅游烹饪学院教授; 博士；黄 杰; 扬州大学中国大运河研究院执行院长; 副教授；李 晴; 扬州大学旅游系硕士研究生。
Author(s):
SUN Kun; HUANG Jie; Li Qing
关键词:
文化遗产; 功能协同; 系统性保护; 协同体系; 督察制度
Keywords:
cultural heritage; function collaboration; systematic protection; coordination system; supervision system
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.002.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
系统性保护传承文化遗产是党和国家提出的一项重要战略任务，主要涉及文化遗产的管理、保护、利用、评价、督察五个关键环节，因此构建“五位一体”的协同体系是系统性保护传承文化遗产的现实需要。当前，文化遗产的管理、保护、利用、评价、督察在功能协同方面尚存在一些问题，如功能环节不健全，对保护的管理不全面、不统一，保护未能充分响应管理目标，利用不完全契合保护要求，未通过评价为其他环节提供充分的信息，也未建立对各环节工作进行督察的制度。针对这些问题，应实行统分结合的管理模式，统一和全面保护文化遗产，创新和优化文化遗产利用方式，实现评价环节的信息支撑功能，发挥督察的监管作用，并促进各环节的功能协同，提高文化遗产保护水平，促进文化遗产系统性保护。
Abstract:
The systematic protection and inheritance of cultural heritage is an important strategic task given by the party and the state at present, which mainly involves the following five key matters: management, protection, utilization, assessment and supervision. Systematically protecting and inheriting cultural heritage requires to construct the "five-in-one" synergetic system based on these five key matters. This study explores the problems existing in the coordination of the above five roles as follows: some roles are absent; the administrations on conservation are not comprehensive and uniform; the conservation doesn’t adequately respond to management objectives; the utilization is not fully compatible with protection requirements; the evaluation is not employed to provide adequate information for other roles; and the system of supervisory on other roles has not been established yet. In response to these problems, we should carry out the management mode that combines the unified management and decentralized management, conserve the cultural heritage uniformly and comprehensively, innovate and optimize the use ways of cultural heritage, make the supervisory play regulation role, and give full play to the information support function of the evaluation role. This helps to achieve functional coordination of all roles, and improve the level of cultural heritage conservation. This paper can provide reference for perfecting the management system of cultural heritage, and accordingly, promoting the systematic conservation.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁浩翰,覃锐钧,雷蒙·刘.港式茶餐厅的转型：从日常茶歇到怀旧情怀[J].中国名城,2020,(07):17.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(2):17.
[2]潘一婷.去殖民化与土著化：加拿大土著建筑遗产保护的探索之路[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
　PAN Yiting.Decolonization and Indigenization：Exploring the Paths of Indigenous Architectural Heritage Conservation in Canada[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
[3]马仁锋,李秋秋,周小靖.中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
　MA Renfeng,LI Qiuqiu,ZHOU Xiaojing.Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China：Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
[4]衣霄翔,于帅.文化导向的收缩城市复兴策略——英国利物浦经验及启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
　YI Xiaoxiang,YU Shuai.Culturally Oriented Shrinking Urban Regeneration Strategies——The Experience and Inspiration of Liverpool，UK[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
[5]杨国安,王小舟.世界遗产入选标准的特征及其对我国申报工作的启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
　YANG Guoan,WANG Xiaozhou.The Characteric of World Heritage Inclusion Criterion and Its Enlightenment to China’s Application for World Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
[6]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[7]王月伦,阮项.城市废墟遗产的价值与保护研究[J].中国名城,2021,(02):87.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(2):87.
[8]王运良.文化遗产旅游开发与提升要素研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
　WANG Yunliang.Research on Elements of Cultural Heritage Tourism Development and Promotion[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
[9]南剑飞.我国地名文化遗产保护名录制度建设之改进对策研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
　NAN Jianfei.Study on the Improvement Path of the System Construction for China Geographical Names Cultural Heritage Protection Lists[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
[10]耿健,胡敏,陈双辰.农耕文化景观的文化内涵与保护研究——以莆田兴化平原洋田为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]
　GENG Jian,HU Min,CHEN Shuangchen.Research on the Cultural Connotation and Protection of Agricultural Cultural Landscape: Taking Plain Yangtian in Xinghua, Putian as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(2):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-12