[1]毛华松,谢守红,刘琮杨,等.长江国家文化公园文化遗产空间分布特征及其影响因素[J].中国名城,2025,39(1):54-64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.001.007]
　MAO Huasong,XIE Shouhong,LIU Congyang,et al.Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Cultural Heritage in Yangtze River National Cultural Park[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(1):54-64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.001.007]
点击复制

长江国家文化公园文化遗产空间分布特征及其影响因素()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年1期
页码:
54-64
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Cultural Heritage in Yangtze River National Cultural Park
文章编号:
1674-4144（2025）001-0054-11
作者:
毛华松; 谢守红; 刘琮杨; 吴映华夏
毛华松，重庆大学建筑城规学院教授，博士生导师；谢守红，重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生；刘琮杨，重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生；吴映华夏，重庆大学建筑城规学院与佛罗伦萨大学人文教育学院联合培养博士研究生。
Author(s):
MAO Huasong; XIE Shouhong; LIU Congyang; WU Yinghuaxia
关键词:
长江国家文化公园; 文化遗产; 空间分布特征; 影响因素
Keywords:
Yangtze River National Cultural Park; cultural heritage; spatial distribution; influencing factors
分类号:
K901.6；TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.001.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
把握文化遗产空间分布特征及其影响因素是国家文化公园总体空间布局、分区分段主题建设、主体功能区划分、基础工程设置等规划建设的客观基础和重要依据。基于开放数据检索，标注了世界文化遗产、全国重点文物保护单位、国家级非物质文化遗产等八类4 421处长江国家文化公园代表性文化遗产，采用核密度分析、不平衡指数、最近邻指数、区位熵及地理探测器等方法分析文化遗产空间分布特征及其影响因素。结果表明：（1）文化遗产整体空间分布呈现出明显的集聚性，具有“西少东多，西疏东密”的特征，形成了“一核两片五点”的分布格局。（2）文化遗产空间分布与流域水系和城市建成区的分布密切相关，93.60%分布在水系10 km缓冲区内，过半的文化遗产分布在城市建成区中。（3）八类文化遗产的核密度呈“两高一中四低”的空间密度分异格局，除世界文化遗产的空间分布模式为随机型外，其余类型均为集聚型。（4）人文社会因素相较自然环境因素对空间分布的影响更大，在具体的因子中高级别景区数量、河网密度、城镇化率三者影响力较大；因子之间的交互作用具有更大的影响力。基于此，从空间视角对长江国家文化公园的规划结构、集群展示、功能区建设、区域协调发展提出建议，从而推动形成布局合理、特色鲜明的长江国家文化公园建设格局。
Abstract:
Grasping the spatial distribution of cultural heritage and the influencing factors is the objective basis and important basis for the planning and construction of the overall spatial layout of the national cultural park, the construction of zoning and segmentation themes, the division of the main functional area, and the setting up of infrastructure projects. Based on the open data, 4 421 representative cultural heritages of the Yangtze River National Cultural Park in 8 categories, such as world cultural heritages, national key cultural relics protection units, national intangible cultural heritages, etc., were retrieved and marked, and the spatial distribution characteristics of the cultural heritages and their influencing factors were analysed through nearest-neighbour indices, imbalance indices, kernel density analysis and geo-detectors. The results show that: (1) the overall spatial distribution of cultural heritage shows obvious agglomeration, with the characteristics of "less in the west and more in the east, sparse in the west and dense in the east", forming a distribution pattern of " one core, two pieces and five points"; (2) the The spatial distribution of cultural heritage is closely related to the distribution of water systems and urban built-up areas, with 97.80% of the cultural heritage distributed in the 10 km buffer zone of water systems, and more than half of the cultural heritage distributed in urban built-up areas; (3) the core density of the eight types of cultural heritage shows a spatial density differentiation pattern of "two high, one medium and four low", except for the spatial distribution pattern of the world cultural heritage, which is random, and the other types are all agglomerative; (4) humanistic and social factors have a greater influence on the spatial distribution than natural environmental factors, and among the specific factors, the number of high-quality scenic spots, river network density and urbanisation rate have a greater influence; the interaction between factors has a greater influence. Based on this, the planning structure, cluster display, boundary delimitation, and regional coordinated development of the Yangtze River National Cultural Park from the spatial perspective are suggested, so as to promote the formation of the Yangtze River National Cultural Park construction pattern with reasonable layout and distinctive features.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁浩翰,覃锐钧,雷蒙·刘.港式茶餐厅的转型：从日常茶歇到怀旧情怀[J].中国名城,2020,(07):17.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(1):17.
[2]潘一婷.去殖民化与土著化：加拿大土著建筑遗产保护的探索之路[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
　PAN Yiting.Decolonization and Indigenization：Exploring the Paths of Indigenous Architectural Heritage Conservation in Canada[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.004]
[3]马仁锋,李秋秋,周小靖.中国大运河遗产保护利用研究动向——政策实践与学术研究互动视角[J].中国名城,2022,36(6):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
　MA Renfeng,LI Qiuqiu,ZHOU Xiaojing.Progress on the Preservation of Grand Canal Heritage of China：Interactive Perspective of Policy Practice and Academic Research[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):88.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.06.012]
[4]衣霄翔,于帅.文化导向的收缩城市复兴策略——英国利物浦经验及启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
　YI Xiaoxiang,YU Shuai.Culturally Oriented Shrinking Urban Regeneration Strategies——The Experience and Inspiration of Liverpool，UK[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):46.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.005]
[5]杨国安,王小舟.世界遗产入选标准的特征及其对我国申报工作的启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
　YANG Guoan,WANG Xiaozhou.The Characteric of World Heritage Inclusion Criterion and Its Enlightenment to China’s Application for World Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.001]
[6]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[7]王月伦,阮项.城市废墟遗产的价值与保护研究[J].中国名城,2021,(02):87.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(1):87.
[8]王运良.文化遗产旅游开发与提升要素研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
　WANG Yunliang.Research on Elements of Cultural Heritage Tourism Development and Promotion[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(1):57.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.008]
[9]南剑飞.我国地名文化遗产保护名录制度建设之改进对策研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
　NAN Jianfei.Study on the Improvement Path of the System Construction for China Geographical Names Cultural Heritage Protection Lists[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(1):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
[10]耿健,胡敏,陈双辰.农耕文化景观的文化内涵与保护研究——以莆田兴化平原洋田为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]
　GENG Jian,HU Min,CHEN Shuangchen.Research on the Cultural Connotation and Protection of Agricultural Cultural Landscape: Taking Plain Yangtian in Xinghua, Putian as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(1):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-15