«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:

39

期数:

2025年10期

页码:

89-96

栏目:

出版日期:

2025-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:

Changes of and Reflections on the Protection and Inheritance Mechanism of Traditional Village Characteristics from the Perspective of Governance

文章编号:

1674-4144（2025）010-0089-08

作者:

李 稷

李 稷，西安建筑科技大学中国城乡建设与文化传承研究院、陕西省新型城镇化和人居环境研究院助理教授。

Author(s):

LI Ji

关键词:

传统村落特色; 保护传承机制; 可持续发展; 乡村治理

Keywords:

characteristics of traditional villages; protection and inheritance mechanism; sustainable development; rural governance

分类号:

TU984

DOI:

10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.012

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

新时代背景下我国传统村落面临特色消解、活力衰退的核心危机，为系统性破解这一困境，引入治理视角，通过解析传统村落特色保护传承机制的流变逻辑，揭示其三大核心维度的协同演进规律。治理主体从“单一”到“多元”再到“共同体”，治理重点从“个体”到“整体”再到“集群式”，治理模式从“保护”到“发展”再到“可持续”的演变过程，在社会、经济、文化与环境等方面仍然存在诸多不可持续性问题。在借鉴英国与日本等先发国家的治理经验基础上，重点围绕治理主体的“多”与“少”、治理重点的“个体”与“群体”、治理模式的“传统”与“现代”等矛盾关系，对我国传统村落特色保护传承机制进行深刻反思，并尝试提出应对思路与方案，旨在推动传统村落可持续发展。

Abstract:

Against the backdrop of the new era, China’s traditional villages are confronted with the core crisis of "characteristic dissipation and vitality decline". To systematically address this dilemma, this study introduces a governance perspective and, by analyzing the evolutionary logic of the characteristic protection and inheritance mechanism for traditional villages, reveals the coordinated evolution law of its three core dimensions. Specifically, the governance subjects shift from "single-body" to "multi-agent" and further to "community", the governance focuses from "individual heritage" to "integrated village" and further to "cluster-based", and the governance models from "protection-oriented" to "development-oriented" and further to "sustainability-oriented". Nevertheless, numerous unsustainability issues still exist in social, economic, cultural, environmental and other dimensions. On the basis of drawing lessons from the governance experiences of pioneering countries such as the United Kingdom and Japan, this study focuses on the contradictory relationships in China’s traditional village governance, including the "quantity of governance subjects (multiplicity vs. scarcity)", the "focus of governance (individual heritage vs. integrated village)" and the "governance model (traditional vs. modern)". It conducts in-depth reflection on the characteristic protection and inheritance mechanism for China’s traditional villages and attempts to propose corresponding response strategies and solutions, aiming to promote the sustainable development of traditional villages