[1]陈永明,黄明翔,王世君.社区营造中的建筑实验:行动者网络视角下的广州“扉行器”研究[J].中国名城,2025,39(10):36-42.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.005]
 CHEN Yongming,HUANG Mingxiang,WANG Shijun.Architectural Experiment in Community Building: A Study of Feixingqi Through the Lens of Actor-Network Theory[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(10):36-42.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.005]
点击复制

社区营造中的建筑实验:行动者网络视角下的广州“扉行器”研究(/HTML)
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年10期
页码:
36-42
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Architectural Experiment in Community Building: A Study of Feixingqi Through the Lens of Actor-Network Theory
文章编号:
1674-4144(2025)010-0036-07
作者:
陈永明黄明翔王世君
陈永明,华南理工大学建筑学院/亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室副教授;黄明翔,华南理工大学建筑学院硕士研究生;王世君,华南理工大学建筑学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
CHEN YongmingHUANG MingxiangWANG Shijun
关键词:
行动者网络理论社区营造空间转译建筑实验扉行器
Keywords:
Actor-Network Theorycommunity buildingspatial translationarchitectural experimentFeixingqi
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.010.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以行动者网络理论(ANT理论)为分析框架,探讨了广州“扉行器”社区营造项目中的建筑实验,旨在解析其公共空间网络的建构与转译过程。研究突破了以人类为中心的传统社区营造模式,将建筑实体、公共空间网络、自然环境等非人行动者纳入动态协作网络,并挖掘其能动性。研究揭示了多维公共空间网络作为转译界面的核心价值,它通过物质、文化、自然三重维度,处理并整合了场地原有的边缘性矛盾。通过对“扉行器”案例的剖析,论述了其从“空间干预”向“网络培育”的转型路径。社区营造的本质并非静态的空间改造,而是人与非人行动者通过其能动性,在转译界面上协同培育社会关系的动态网络过程。研究旨在为建筑师在社区治理中的角色转型提供方法论支持,为理解当代社区营造的复杂机制、激活城市边缘空间提供新的视角和路径 。
Abstract:
Drawing on Actor-Network Theory (ANT) as an analytical framework, this paper investigates the architectural experiment of the "Feixingqi" community-building project in Guangzhou. It aims to dissect the construction and translation processes of its public space network. This study first breaks away from the traditional human-centered community-building model by incorporating non-human actors—such as architectural entities, public space networks, and the natural environment—into a dynamic collaborative network and by exploring their agency. The research reveals the core value of the multidimensional public space network as a key translation interface. Through its material, cultural, and natural dimensions, this interface addresses and integrates the site’s inherent marginal contradictions. By analyzing the “Feixingqi” case, the study discusses its transition from “spatial intervention” to “network cultivation.” The essence of community building is not static spatial renovation but a dynamic process where human and non-human actors, through their agency, collaboratively cultivate a social relational network on the translation interface. This article aims to provide methodological support for the evolving role of architects in community governance and offers new perspectives and pathways for understanding the complex mechanisms of contemporary community building and activating marginalized urban spaces.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]史文正,张 彧.社区营造角度下的历史文化街区更新研究——以平遥古城县衙片区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(9):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.011]
 SHI Wenzheng,ZHANG Yu.Research on the Regeneration of Historical Districts from the Perspective of Community Involvement: Taking Town County Block in Pingyao as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.009.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-15