S-CAD方法下建筑遗产认养认领机制的国际比较与启示-中国名城

文章信息/Info

Title:: International Comparison and Enlightenment of Architectural Heritage Adoption Mechanism under S-CAD Method

作者:: 杨迪; 曹馨叶; 陈金留; 姚颖; 林治; 杨迪，中国-葡萄牙文化遗产保护科学“一带一路”联合实验室、文化遗产保护科学“一带一路”国际合作联合实验室、福建理工大学建筑与城乡规划学院副教授，博士；曹馨叶，福建理工大学建筑与城乡规划学院硕士研究生；陈金留（通信作者），中国-葡萄牙文化遗产保护科学“一带一路”联合实验室、文化遗产保护科学“一带一路”国际合作联合实验室、苏州城市学院艺术与创意设计学院讲师，博士；姚颖，福州市历史文化名城管理委员会工程师；林治，福州市历史文化名城研究保护中心工程师。

Keywords:: architectural heritage; adoption; S-CAD method; international comparison; policy implication

摘要:: 近年来，建筑遗产保护成为全球重要议题，认养认领机制作为一种新模式逐渐受到关注。然而，国内认养认领模式多数被视为社会力量参与建筑遗产保护的一个子维度，缺少将其作为核心议题的深入探讨，尚未利用成熟的政策评估方法系统性评估国内外建筑遗产政策的特征与差异。采用S-CAD政策评估方法，探讨建筑遗产认养认领机制在印度、美国、意大利、澳大利亚四国的差异，并分析其对中国的启示，从主观性、一致性、充要性和依赖性的角度出发，提出强化省政府主导性，明确不同建筑遗产的法律目标，细化申请流程，监管养护全周期，健全社会资本参与的多维度激励机制，加强反馈管理和惩戒处置等建议，以提高国内建筑遗产认养认领机制的完整性、系统性，更新现行建筑遗产认养认领机制。

Abstract:: In recent years, architectural heritage protection has become an important global issue, and the adoption mechanism as a new model has gradually attracted attention. However, most domestic adoption models are regarded as a sub-dimension of social forces participating in architectural heritage protection. There is a lack of in-depth discussion on it as a core issue, and there is still a lack of systematic evaluation of the characteristics and differences of domestic and foreign architectural heritage policies using mature policy evaluation methods. This study uses the S-CAD policy evaluation method to explore the differences in architectural heritage adoption mechanisms in India, the United States, Italy and Australia, and analyzes its implications for China. From the perspectives of subjectivity, consistency, sufficiency and dependence, it proposes to strengthen the leading role of provincial governments, clarify the legal objectives of different architectural heritages, refine the application process, supervise the entire maintenance cycle, establish a multi-dimensional incentive mechanism for social capital participation, strengthen feedback management and disciplinary measures, in order to improve the integrity, systematicness of the domestic architectural heritage adoption mechanism and update the current architectural heritage adoption mechanism.