[1]辜元,钱紫华,陈链.国土空间规划视角下大遗址保护区划优化研究——以钓鱼城古战场遗址为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):24-31.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.004]
 GU Yuan,QIAN Zihua,CHEN Lian.Protection Zoning Optimization of Large-scale Archaeological Site from the Perspective of Territorial Spatial Planning——Taking Diaoyucheng Ancient Battlefield Site as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):24-31.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.004]
点击复制

国土空间规划视角下大遗址保护区划优化研究——以钓鱼城古战场遗址为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
36
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
24-31
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Protection Zoning Optimization of Large-scale Archaeological Site from the Perspective of Territorial Spatial Planning——Taking Diaoyucheng Ancient Battlefield Site as an Example
文章编号:
1674-4144(2022)010-0024-08
作者:
辜元钱紫华陈链
辜元,重庆市规划设计研究院部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实验室高级工程师;钱紫华(通信作者),重庆市规划设计研究院部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实验室正高级工程师;陈链,重庆市规划设计研究院部国土空间规划监测评估预警重点实验室助理规划师。
Author(s):
GU YuanQIAN ZihuaCHEN Lian
关键词:
大遗址国土空间规划保护区划区划分级分类区划管理规定钓鱼城
Keywords:
large-scale archaeological siteterritorial spatial planningprotection zoningprotection zoning classificationprotection zoning management regulation ordinanceDiaoyucheng
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大遗址保护区划作为“历史文化保护线”的重要构成,不仅是大遗址保护规划的核心内容,而且是国土空间规划的强制性内容,因此必须做好保护区划划定与国土空间规划的协同。研究基于大遗址整体保护和活化利用的原则,剖析两者在协同方面存在的核心问题与原因,以钓鱼城古战场遗址为例,分别从保护区划定、区划分级分类、区划管理规定3个方面提出优化路径:即统筹各类空间要素的“保护范围”“建设控制地带”划定、兼顾各类空间保护发展需求的保护区划分级分类、实施用途管制的保护区划管理规定。
Abstract:
As an important component of the "historical and cultural protection space", the protection zoning is the core of the conservation plan for large-scale archaeological site, and is also a compulsory content of the territorial spatial planning, so it is important to work in close collaboration between protection zoning and territorial spatial planning. Following the principle of overall protection and revitalization, the study analyzes the collaborative problem. Then, taking an example of Diaoyucheng ancient battlefield site, the study proposes an optimization framework for three dimensions of protection zoning, zoning classification and zoning management regulations: the delineation of "protection area" and "development control area" for the integration of various spatial elements, the classification taking into account the development needs of all types of spatial protection, the regulations by means of use control.

相似文献/References:

[1]宋玢,王英帆,赵潇.国土空间规划背景下市域村庄规划思考与实践——以陕西省渭南市为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):39.
 SONG Bin,WANG Yingfan,ZHAO Xiao.Thinking and Practice of Village Planning in the National Territory Spatial Planning:a Case of Weinan City,Shanxi Province[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):39.
[2]杜 澍,周 君,赵 坤,等.中国城市文化空间研究的进展、趋势和应用建议[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):1.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.001]
 DU Shu,ZHOU Jun,ZHAO Kun,et al.The Research on Progress,Trend and Application Suggestion of Urban[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):1.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.001]
[3]陈宏胜,周小涵,肖扬.基于“应然”视角的国土空间规划的演变与作用探讨[J].中国名城,2022,36(5):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.001]
 CHEN Hongsheng,ZHOU Xiaohan,XIAO Yang.Discussion on the Evolution and Function of Territory Spatial Planning Based on the Perspective of “Ought to Be”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):3.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.001]
[4]冯艳,惠将城.县域乡村地区历史空间意境设计方法研究——以安徽省固镇县“两带”为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):79.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.011]
 FENG Yan,HUI Jiangcheng.Study on Artistic Conception Design Method of Historical Space in Countryside Rural Area:[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):79.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.011]
[5]田海松.国土空间规划中大遗址保护策略研究——以安徽凤阳明中都遗址为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.005]
 TIAN Haisong.Research on the Protection Strategy of the Complex Sites in Territorial Space Planning:a Case Study of the Ming Zhongdu Site in Fengyang,Anhui Province[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.005]
[6]袁 方.山水人文小镇国土空间优化路径研究——以北京门头沟区潭柘寺镇为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.009]
 YUAN Fang.Research on the Optimization Path of Territory Spatial Planning for Landscape Humanistic Towns:A Case Study of Tanzhe Temple Town Beijing Mentougou[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.009]
[7]姜 娜,马育辰.国土空间规划背景下的城市生态基础设施规划构建研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(3):19.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.003]
 JIANG Na,MA Yuchen.Establishing Urban Ecological Infrastructure Planning in the Context of TerritorySpatial Planning[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):19.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.003]
[8]陈 岚,谭 林,陈春华,等.基于非物质文化遗产空间结构特征的规划发展路径——以绵阳市为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(3):38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.006]
 CHEN Lan,TAN Lin,CHEN Chunhua,et al.The Spatial Pattern of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Mianyang City and the Planning Response Path[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.006]
[9]王 鑫.城市保护地边缘地带生态适宜性评价研究——以扬州蜀冈-瘦西湖风景名胜区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(10):83.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.010]
 WANG Xin.Ecological Suitability Evaluation of Urban Protected Area Fringe Belt Research:A Case Study of Shugang-Slender West Lake Scenic Area, Yangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):83.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.010.010]
[10]徐煜辉,朱 佳.多规合一视角下昆明市郊野单元规划编制推进路径探析[J].中国名城,2024,38(4):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.004.003]
 XU Yuhui,ZHU Jia.Preliminary Study on the Promotion Path of Kunming Rural Unit Planning from the Perspective of Multi Planning Integration[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.004.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-01