[1]王志章 何 静.英美两国城市化进程中的扶贫开发模式研究与借鉴 *[J].中国名城,2015,(04):4-15.
 Wang Zhizhang He Jing.An Analysis of Britain and American Poverty Alleviation and Development Pattern and Its Revelation[J].China Ancient City,2015,(04):4-15.
点击复制

英美两国城市化进程中的扶贫开发模式研究与借鉴 *()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
4-15
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-04-19

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Analysis of Britain and American Poverty Alleviation and Development Pattern and Its Revelation
文章编号:
1674-4144(2015)-04-4(12)
作者:
王志章 何 静
王志章,西南大学经济管理学院教授、博士生导师、华侨大学特聘教授、国家社会科学基金学科规划评审专家。
何静,西南大学经济管理学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
Wang Zhizhang He Jing
关键词:
工业化扶贫开发模式英美两国
Keywords:
industrializationpoverty alleviation anddevelopmentpatternBoth Britain and America
分类号:
C912
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以英美两国为对象,着重研究了19、20世纪英国以及二战后美国的贫困问题,阐明了英美贫困的历史根源和具体表现形态。在这一进程中,英美两国一直处于不断转型的关键时期,扶贫开发在社会和谐发展中扮演着十分重要的角色,以至于20世纪以来成为两国衡量每届政府政绩的试金石。回顾总结梳理两国在区域和人口扶贫开发方面形成的特定的模式和取得的经验,无疑对我国打好新时期扶贫攻坚战具有一定的启示。
Abstract:
This article focuses on the subject of both Britain and America , studies the poverty in the 19th and 20th century Britain and United States after world war ii, illustrates the historical roots of the British and American poverty and their concrete manifestation . In the process, Both Britain and America have been in a critical period of continuous transformation, poverty alleviation and development plays a very important role in the social harmonious development, that become the touchstone to two countries, measuring every government achievements since the 20th century .The paper has Reviewed, summarized and combed the two countries ’specific patterns and experiences formed in terms of area and population of poverty alleviation and development, which will have no doubt the certain enlightenment to the battle for poverty alleviation in the new period of China.

参考文献/References:

[1] SeebohmRowntree.Poverty: A Study of a Town Life[M].Bristol: Policy Press,2000:105-115.
[2] Townsend,Peter.(1972)Poverty in the United Kingdom,转引自杨立熊,谢丹丹.“绝对的相对”,抑或“相对的绝对”—汤森和森的贫困理论比较[J].财经科学,2007,(1):59-66
[3]杨立熊,谢丹丹.“绝对的相对”,抑或”相对的绝对”—汤森和森的贫困理论比较[J],财经科学,2007,(1):59-66
[4]阿马蒂亚 .森贫困与饥荒[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2001.26-27.
[5]解烜.贫困度量问题研究[D].湖南:湘潭大学商学院,2006.
[6] HaroldPerkin.The Origins of Modern English Society[M].London:Routledge,2002:147.
[7]丁建定.英国新济贫法的出现及反新济贫法运动[J].东岳论丛,2011,32(5):20.
[8] AsaBriggs.A social history of England[M].Penguin Books Press,Limited,1991:53.
[9] P.Lindert, J. Williamson. English worker’s Real Wages: a Reply to Craft[J].经济史杂志,1985,(45):145
[10]C.P.Hill, British Economic and Social History:1700-1982[M].London: Edward Arnold ,1985:293-294
[11]Carey Oppenheim & Lisa Harker.Poverty: The Pacts,Revised and Updated 3rd ed., CPAC Ltd.,转引自民政部.当代欧洲贫困问题及欧盟的反贫困政策研究http://www.gov.cn/ ztzl/2005-12/31/content_143773.htm
[12] Hugh Cunningham. The Employment and Unemployment of Children in England .c.1680-1851[J].Pastand Present, 1990(2):115-150.
[13] PatricaMorgan.Children,Family And The Failure Of UK Anti-Poverty Policy[J].Economic Affairs,2007,27(3):32-38
[14] B.R.Mitchell.Britishhistorical statistics[M].London:Cambridge University Press,2011:5.
[15]甫玉龙,刘杰.美国贫困问题研究专家哈瑞尔 .罗杰斯访谈录[J].世界历史,2010,(3):141.
[16] Norman L. Rosenberg, Emily S. Rosenberg.In our times America Since Word II[M].New Jersey: Pearson,2002:55.
[17] http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/historical/people.htmltable2、table24,2014-08-31
[18] 同上
[19] Phillip J. ObermillerWilliam W. Philliber.Appalachia in an International Context: Cross-national Comparisons of Developing Regions[M].New York:GreenwoodPress,1994:4.
[20] 甫玉龙,刘杰.美国贫困问题研究专家哈瑞尔.罗杰斯访谈录[J].世界历史,2010,(3):141.
[21]尼古拉斯 .巴尔,大卫 .怀恩斯(编).福利经济学前沿问题[M].北京:中国税务出版社,2000:135.
[22] 王紹光.多元与统一——第三部门国际比较研究[M],转引自续亚萍.美国非政府组织反贫困研究[D].石家庄:河北大学管理学院,2009.
[23] 同上
[24]黄贤全.美国政府对南部落后地区的扶植与开发[J].世界历史,2001,(5):11.
[25]王俊文.国外反贫困经验对我国反贫困的当代启示——以西方发达国家美国为例[J].社会科学家,2008,(3):104.
[26]10年从贫困村到“一等村”,[EB/OL].http://www. scfpym.gov.cn/show.aspx?id=19909,2014-08-30.责任编辑:王凌宇

更新日期/Last Update: 2015-04-30