[1]甘文泉,潘丽宇,段 然,等.可持续发展视角下以生态空间需求为导向的城市更新方法研究——以苏州市吴江区为例[J].中国名城,2025,39(9):28-40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.009.004]
　GAN Wenquan,PAN Liyu,DUAN Ran,et al.Ecologically-Oriented Urban Renewal Methodological Framework from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of Wujiang District，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(9):28-40.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.009.004]
点击复制

可持续发展视角下以生态空间需求为导向的城市更新方法研究——以苏州市吴江区为例()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年9期
页码:
28-40
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ecologically-Oriented Urban Renewal Methodological Framework from a Sustainable Development Perspective: A Case Study of Wujiang District，Suzhou
文章编号:
1674-4144（2025）009-0028-13
作者:
甘文泉; 潘丽宇; 段 然; 陈 冰
甘文泉，浙江理工大学艺术与设计学院讲师，博士；潘丽宇，澳门城市大学城市与可持续发展研究院博士研究生；段 然，宁波工程学院建筑与交通工程学院副教授；陈 冰（通信作者），西交利物浦大学设计学院副教授，博士生导师。
Author(s):
GAN Wenquan; PAN Liyu; DUAN Ran; CHEN Bing
关键词:
城市更新; 多源数据; 复合景观; 可持续发展; 生态; 吴江区
Keywords:
urban renewal; muti-source data; composite landscape; sustainable development; ecology; Wujiang District
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.009.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
提升城市生态系统韧性是推动城市高质量与可持续发展的重要基础，城市更新作为协调生态保护与功能提升的关键手段，亟须系统性的方法指导。研究构建了一个基于“生态—空间—需求”统筹的城市更新框架，探索生态资源保护、城市功能空间优化和居民需求之间的耦合路径。具体实施可分为3个阶段：（1）通过生态网络模拟提取生态廊道，修复快速城镇化造成的生态割裂，提升城市生态韧性以支撑可持续发展；（2）基于多源数据对城市空间环境状况和设施分布进行评估，结合人口密度和年龄结构分析，精准识别城市更新的潜在需求；（3）叠加城市生态网络与更新需求，制定针对性更新策略以推动城市生态系统和功能空间的协同发展。以苏州市吴江区为例，对框架进行应用验证，结果表明松陵镇和盛泽镇中心区域及汾湖、元荡、太浦河沿岸地区具有较高的更新需求。基于研究结果提出构建生态迁徙、休闲游憩和低碳慢行廊道的复合型策略，以推动城市功能区向生态宜居的“公园化”空间转型。研究提出的研究框架可为城市更新决策提供系统性的理论参考和数据支撑，促进生态功能与城市空间协同优化，进而增强城市韧性与活力。
Abstract:
Enhancing urban ecosystem resilience is fundamental to high-quality and sustainable urban development. Urban renewal is a crucial tool for balancing ecological conservation with functional improvement, necessitating a systematic methodological framework. This study proposes an integrated "Ecology-Spatial-Needs" framework that identifies optimal pathways for coupling ecological resource protection, functional space optimisation, and residents’ spatial needs. The framework consists of three stages. Firstly, ecological network analysis is used to identify critical ecological corridors, repairing fragmentation caused by rapid urbanisation and strengthening ecosystem resilience as a basis for sustainable development. Secondly, multi-source data evaluation assesses environmental conditions and facility distributions, and identifies renewal needs by incorporating population density and age structure. Thirdly, the analysis of the ecological network is combined with the demand for renewal to formulate targeted renewal strategies that promote the coordinated development of ecological and functional urban spaces. The framework is empirically validated in the Wujiang District, Suzhou. The results indicate that high renewal needs are concentrated in the centre of Songling and Shengze Town and along the ecological patches like Fen Lake, Yuandang Lake, and Taipu River. Based on these findings, the study proposes strategies for constructing ecological migration corridors, recreational greenways, and low-carbon transit corridors to guide the "parkification" of urban functional areas toward ecologically livable spaces. The proposed framework offers systematic theoretical guidance and data-driven support for urban renewal decision-making, promotes coordinated optimisation of ecological functions and urban spaces, and enhances urban resilience and vitality.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
　LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
　YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area：a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
　CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City：a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
　LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal：Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
　LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]申世广,张珮瑶.基于多源数据的历史文化街区品质评估——以河南洛阳老城东、西南隅历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
　SHEN Shiguang,ZHANG Peiyao.Quality Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-source Data：A Case Study of the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Luoyang Old City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-09-09