[1]蔡宜君,杨 华,施雨君.基于产权治理的闲置历史建筑活化利用实施路径研究——以广州为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):63-69.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.009]
　CAI Yijun,YANG Hua,SHI Yujun.Research on the Implementation Path of Revitalization and Utilization of Idle Historic Buildings Based on Property Rights Governance: A Case Study of Guangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):63-69.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.009]
点击复制

基于产权治理的闲置历史建筑活化利用实施路径研究——以广州为例()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
63-69
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Implementation Path of Revitalization and Utilization of Idle Historic Buildings Based on Property Rights Governance: A Case Study of Guangzhou City
文章编号:
1674-4144（2024）010-0063-07
作者:
蔡宜君; 杨 华; 施雨君
蔡宜君，广州市城市规划设计有限公司名城保护所执行规划师，工程师；杨 华，广州市岭南建筑研究中心建筑创作所执行规划师，助理工程师；施雨君（通信作者），广州市城市规划设计有限公司名城保护所所长，高级工程师，注册规划师，住房城乡建设部历史文化遗产监测重点实验室成员，西安建筑科技大学博士研究生。
Author(s):
CAI Yijun; YANG Hua; SHI Yujun
关键词:
历史建筑; 闲置; 产权治理; 活化利用; 制度设计; 广州
Keywords:
historic buildings; vacancy; property theory; activation and utilization; system design; Guangzhou City
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国历史建筑从静态保护进入活化利用的新阶段，“闲置”现象成为当前历史文化保护传承工作的掣肘，亦是城市更新背景下存量资源盘活的潜在机遇。以广州市为研究样本，运用产权理论解析历史建筑闲置本质内涵和成因，识别不同产权历史建筑的利用障碍。借鉴国内外遗产保护的典型经验，以“资产管理”为导向，提出4种历史建筑保护利用的产权重构模式，以及相应“责任-经济-制度”的产权机制保障建议，期望为城乡建设中历史建筑活化保护的可持续路径提供思路。
Abstract:
While the activation and utilization of historic buildings has become a common way instead of static protection in China, the vacancy of historic buildings is not only a hindrance on historical and cultural protection and inheritance work, but also a potential opportunity for the revitalization of stock resources in urban renewal. Based on vacant historic buildings in Guangzhou City, the study analyzes the connotation and causes of vacancy by introducing property theory, and identifies hindrances in utilization of historic buildings under different properties. This paper draws on the experience of heritage conservation around the world, and proposes four property reconstruction modes of historic buildings conservation guided by "asset management" and the corresponding "Responsibility-Economy-System" guarantee mechanism, hoping to provide ideas for the sustainable path of protection and activation of historic buildings in urban and rural construction.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴晓晖.德国历史建筑保护与活化利用的经验启示[J].中国名城,2020,(12):41.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(10):41.
[2]陈曦,董凤华.历史建筑活化利用融资及激励途径研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):19.
　CHEN Xi,DONG Fenghua.Research on Financing and Incentive Approaches of Active Utilization of Historical Buildings[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):19.
[3]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
　CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration：the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-12