[1]田 琦,王显维,雷涛铖.非典型历史街区遗产保护的社区参与策略研究——以重庆水土老街陵江社区为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):31-38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.005]
 TIAN Qi,WANG Xianwei,LEI Taocheng.A Study on Community Participation Strategies for Heritage Conservation in Atypical Historic Neighbourhoods: The Case of Lingjiang Community in Chongqing Shuitu Old Street[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):31-38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.005]
点击复制

非典型历史街区遗产保护的社区参与策略研究——以重庆水土老街陵江社区为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
31-38
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on Community Participation Strategies for Heritage Conservation in Atypical Historic Neighbourhoods: The Case of Lingjiang Community in Chongqing Shuitu Old Street
文章编号:
1674-4144(2024)010-0031-08
作者:
田 琦王显维雷涛铖
田 琦,重庆大学建筑城规学院副教授;王显维(通信作者),重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生;雷涛铖,重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
TIAN QiWANG XianweiLEI Taocheng
关键词:
非典型历史街区遗产保护社区参与多元主体 自发参与重庆
Keywords:
atypical historic districtsheritage conservationcommunity participationmultiple subjectsspontaneous participationChongqing City
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史文化街区的遗产价值已得到普遍认同,并通过“精英式”“重投入”的方式被率先保护。而相较于历史文化街区,非典型历史街区面临社会关注度低、企业和政府投入不足、社区参与程度低下等一系列保护困境。基于此,建构了社区参与内生性因素和外源性因素相结合的遗产保护策略。以重庆市北碚区水土老街陵江社区为实证案例进行深度剖析,提出内生性因素“需求匹配”“能力输出”“价值认同”刺激居民自发参与,外源性因素“赋利”“赋能”“赋智”引导居民主动参与。进一步总结为“激励”“实施”“保障”层面的社区参与策略,以期为此类型历史街区的遗产保护提供思路借鉴。
Abstract:
The heritage value of historical and cultural districts has been widely recognized, and they have been first protected through "elite style" and "heavy investment" methods. Compared to historical and cultural districts, atypical historical districts face a series of protection difficulties, such as lack of prominent value, low willingness of various sectors of society to intervene, and insufficient enthusiasm for community participation. Based on this, this article constructs a heritage protection strategy that combines community participatory endogenous and exogenous factors. Taking Lingjiang Community in Shuitu Old Street as an empirical case, we conduct a deep analysis, proposing that endogenous factors such as "demand matching", "ability output", and "value identification" stimulate spontaneous participation of residents, while exogenous factors such as "empowerment", "benefits giving", and "intelligence" guide residents to actively participate. We further summarize the community participation strategies at the levels of "motivation", "implementation", and "guarantee", in order to provide ideas and references for the heritage protection of this type of historical blocks.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 璇.基于真实历史图景和HUL的历史城区复兴规划方法——以河南省周口市“周口源”地区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.010]
 YANG Xuan.A Planning Framework to Urban Renaissance,Based on Authentic Historical Scenes Inquiry and HUL Methods.An Example of Zhokouyuan Area,Zhoukou,Henan Province[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.010]
[2]杨开,丁俊翔,李陶.历史文化名镇名村数字博物馆研究进展与发展趋势[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):15.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.003]
 YANG Kai,DING Junxiang,LI Tao.Research Progress and Development Trend of Digital Museums in Historic Town and Village[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):15.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.003]
[3]朱明松,宋桂杰,黄杰.2022“运河遗产与致富河、幸福河”学术研讨会综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]
 ZHU Mingsong,SONG Guijie,HUANG Jie.Summary of the 2022 Symposium on the Grand Canal Heritage and the River of Prosperity and Happiness[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):90.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.010.012]
[4]张 松.国家历史文化名城保护立法进程与未来展望[J].中国名城,2023,37(1):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
 ZHANG Song.The Legislative Process and Future Prospects of the National Historic and Cultural Cities Conservation[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.001.005]
[5]南剑飞.我国地名文化遗产保护名录制度建设之改进对策研究[J].中国名城,2023,37(6):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
 NAN Jianfei.Study on the Improvement Path of the System Construction for China Geographical Names Cultural Heritage Protection Lists[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(10):11.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.006.002]
[6]陈 鹏,许 尊.区域协调框架下对文化遗产保护的认识重构——“欧洲之心”对我国历史文化保护传承工作的启示[J].中国名城,2024,38(5):43.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.005.006]
 CHEN Peng,XU Zun.Reconstruction of the Understanding of Cultural Heritage Conservation under the Framework of Regional Coordination: The Enlightenment of Centrop on the Historical Heritage in China[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):43.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.005.006]
[7]李小龙,闫启航,刘丫丫,等.基于“五感并重”感知模型的历史文化遗产空间评价方法研究[J].中国名城,2024,38(11):65.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.011.008]
 LI Xiaolong,YAN Qihang,LIU Yaya,et al.Research on the Historical and Cultural Heritage Space Evaluation Method Based on "Five Senses Integration" Perception Model[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):65.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.011.008]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-11