[1]刘玉亭,黄燕如,赵楠楠,等.迈向“共治”：21世纪以来中国城市社区治理研究评述[J].中国名城,2024,38(2):26-32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.002.004]
　LIU Yuting,HUANG Yanru,ZHAO Nannan,et al.Towards "Co-Governance" : Literature Review of Neighborhood Governance in Urban China Since the 21st Century[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):26-32.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.002.004]
点击复制

迈向“共治”：21世纪以来中国城市社区治理研究评述()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年2期
页码:
26-32
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Towards "Co-Governance" : Literature Review of Neighborhood Governance in Urban China Since the 21st Century
文章编号:
1674-4144（2024）002-0026-07
作者:
刘玉亭; 黄燕如; 赵楠楠; 黄世臻
刘玉亭，华南理工大学建筑学院/亚热带建筑与城市科学全国重点实验室教授，博士生导师；黄燕如，华南理工大学建筑学院硕士研究生；赵楠楠（通信作者），华南理工大学公共管理学院博士后；黄世臻，华南理工大学建筑学院博士研究生。
Author(s):
LIU Yuting; HUANG Yanru; ZHAO Nannan; HUANG Shizhen
关键词:
社区治理; 治理理论; 多元共治; 制度变迁; 文献分析
Keywords:
neighborhood governance; governance theory; co-governance; institutional change; literature analysis
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.002.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
城市社区作为中国社会基层治理的“最后一公里”，不仅是实现人民对美好生活向往的空间载体，而且是多元主体紧密互动的枢纽平台。受社会经济环境变化以及社区建设相关政策的影响，中国社区治理的主体、模式及结构近年来经历较大转变，基于多元主体协商的“共治”模式成为社区治理的新趋势。通过梳理国内中国城市社区治理相关文献，从内涵演变、主体关系、模式演变、制度结构等4个维度，识别了社区治理在中国语境的概念化特征。21世纪以来，中国社区治理各行动主体间关系体现了从“一元结构”向“多元共治”的转变，相关研究内容与近20年中国社区发展政策及制度体系的变迁紧密相关，体现为政府统筹建设、多元主体分化、数智精细治理3个发展阶段。最后，在本土化理论创新、跨学科视角转向、技术化综合应用等方面提出研究展望。
Abstract:
As the "last mile" of urban governance in China, urban community is not only a spatial carrier to realize people’s yearning for a better life, but also a hub platform for close interaction of multiple subjects. Influenced by the changes in social economic environment and the policy transformation related to community construction, the subject, model and structure of neighborhood governance in China have undergone great changes in recent years. The co-governance model based on multi-subject consultation has become a new trend of neighborhood governance. Through combing the literature on neighborhood governance in Chinese cities, we identify the conceptualization characteristics of neighborhood governance in Chinese context from four dimensions: connotation evolution, subject relationship, model evolution, and institutional structure. Since the 21st century, China has moved to pluralistic co-governance. The relevant research is closely related to the changes of community development policy and institutional system in the past 20 years, which is reflected in the three stages of development: governmental coordination and construction, pluralistic differentiation, and numerical and intellectual fine governance. In addition, this paper identifies the development trend of future research on neighborhood governance, and puts forward research prospects in the aspects of localization theory innovation, interdisciplinary perspective transformation and comprehensive application of technology.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈 岚,苏 婷,谭 林.健康社区国内外研究进展及未来展望[J].中国名城,2024,38(6):9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.006.002]
　CHEN Lan,SU Ting,TAN Lin.Research Progress and Future Prospects of Healthy Communities[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):9.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.006.002]
[2]张晓杰,王 孝.活跃性主体和理性式的社区居民参与治理模型研究[J].中国名城,2024,38(7):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.007.004]
　ZHANG Xiaojie,WANG Xiao.Research on the Model of Active Subject and Rational Community Residents’ Participation in Governance[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(2):23.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.007.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-07