[1]张国超,唐 培,陈志军.旅游活动对世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展影响——以我国9处世界遗产地为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):76-84.
 ZHANG Guochao,TANG Pei,CHEN Zhijun.Impact of Tourism Activities on the Sustainable Development of Communities in World Cultural Heritage Sites:Taking 9 Heritage Sites in China as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):76-84.
点击复制

旅游活动对世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展影响——以我国9处世界遗产地为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
36
期数:
2022年1期
页码:
76-84
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-01-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Tourism Activities on the Sustainable Development of Communities in World Cultural Heritage Sites:Taking 9 Heritage Sites in China as an Example
作者:
张国超唐 培陈志军
张国超,武汉轻工大学管理学院教授;陈志军,上海财经大学商学院博士研究生;唐 培,华东师范大学经济与管理学部应用经济学流动站博士后。
Author(s):
ZHANG GuochaoTANG PeiCHEN Zhijun
关键词:
世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展模糊综合评价重要性-表现分析
Keywords:
communities in world cultural heritage sitessustainable developmentfuzzy comprehensive evaluationimportance-performance analysis
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目前学界尚缺乏关于旅游活动对世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展影响的研究。在对我国9处世界遗产地社区调查的基础上,利用模糊综合评价法对旅游活动对我国世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展影响进行了评价。研究结果表明:旅游活动不仅没有给我国世界文化遗产地社区可持续发展带来显著的促进作用,反而产生了不利影响。亟需解决的问题有:(1)旅游活动给工艺品地域特色、本地文化认同感等带来的不利社会文化影响。(2)旅游活动给自然植被、空气质量、水体质量等造成的不利生态环境影响。(3)旅游活动未给五台山、平遥古城、武当山社区居民就业带来预期的有利经济影响。(4)旅游活动对我国世界文化遗产地社区经济、社会文化和生态环境的影响失衡。
Abstract:
There is a lack of research on the impact of tourism activities on the sustainable development of communities in world cultural heritage sites (WCHS). Based on the survey conducted in 9 communities of China’ s world heritage sites, the impact of tourism activities on the sustainable development of communities in China’ s WCHS is evaluated by using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation. The results show that tourism activities do not promote the sustainable development of communities in China’ s WCHS; instead, it has a negative impact. Problems that need to be solved urgently include: 1) Adverse socio-cultural impacts of tourism activities on regional features of handicrafts and local cultural identity. 2) Adverse eco-environmental impacts of tourism activities on natural vegetation, air quality and water quality. 3) Tourism activities have not brought expected beneficial economic impacts on the employment of community residents in Wutai Mountain, Pingyao Ancient City and Wudang Mountain. 4) The impact of tourism activities on economy, socio-culture and eco-environment of communities in China’ s WCHS is unbalanced.

相似文献/References:

[1]陶慧,杨洋,田大江,等.韧性视角下乡村遗产地的空间实践与适应性重构——以河北省清西陵为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.008]
 TAO Hui,YANG Yang,TIAN Dajiang,et al.Spatial Practice and Adaptive Reconstruction of Rural Heritage Sites from the Perspective of Resilience:Taking Western Royal Tombs of the Qing Dynasty in Hebei Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(1):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.11.008]
[2]刘 莉,魏江磊,周铁刚.气候变化背景下西安历史文化名城保护的立法建议[J].中国名城,2023,37(8):24.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.008.004]
 LIU Li,WEI Jianglei,ZHOU Tiegang.Legislative Suggestions on the Protection of Xi’an Historical and Cultural City under the Background of Climate Change[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(1):24.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.008.004]
[3]刘泽照,杨嘉慧.城市绿色转型的逻辑理路与实践进路——江苏徐州可持续发展探索考察[J].中国名城,2024,38(1):16.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.001.003]
 LIU Zezhao,YANG Jiahui.The Logical Reasoning and Practical Pathway of Urban Green Transformation: An Exploration Based on Sustainable Development in Xuzhou[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(1):16.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.001.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-09