[1]李 果,戴宇琦,安 菲.集中连片保护背景下传统村落韧性类型及障碍因子识别——以湘西地区429个传统村落为例[J].中国名城,2026,40(6):72-84.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.009]
　LI Guo,DAI Yuqi,AN Fei.Identification of Resilience Types and Obstacle Factors of Traditional Villages in the Context of Concentrated and Contiguous Conservation: A Case Study of 429 Traditional Villages in Western Hunan[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(6):72-84.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.009]
点击复制

集中连片保护背景下传统村落韧性类型及障碍因子识别——以湘西地区429个传统村落为例()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年6期
页码:
72-84
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Identification of Resilience Types and Obstacle Factors of Traditional Villages in the Context of Concentrated and Contiguous Conservation: A Case Study of 429 Traditional Villages in Western Hunan
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）006-0072-13
作者:
李 果; 戴宇琦; 安 菲
李 果，中南林业科技大学园林与建筑学院副教授，湖南省自然保护地风景资源大数据工程技术研究中心，博士；戴宇琦，中南林业科技大学园林与建筑学院硕士研究生；安 菲，中南林业科技大学园林与建筑学院硕士。
Author(s):
LI Guo; DAI Yuqi; AN Fei
关键词:
传统村落; 韧性评价; 韧健度模型; 湘西地区
Keywords:
traditional villages; resilience evaluation; resilience model; western Hunan
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在传统村落集中连片保护背景下，测度区域传统村落韧性水平并识别韧性类型，对统筹推进村落韧性整体提升与集中连片保护有重要指导意义。以湘西地区429个国家级传统村落为例，基于韧健度模型构建“外部扰动-本底脆性-适应韧力”韧性评价指标体系并进行量化评价，探究湘西地区传统村落整体韧性水平。运用障碍度模型和主导因素识别法划分传统村落韧性类型并识别主导障碍因素。结果表明：（1）湘西地区传统村落综合韧性多处于中低水平，冷热点分布呈现“南热北冷”格局，“高高”聚集区集中在怀化市。（2）传统村落韧性类型包括扰动类、脆性类、韧力类、扰动-脆性类、扰动-韧力类、脆性-韧力类。结合主导障碍因子，提出各类型传统村落韧性提升策略，为湘西地区及类似集中连片传统村落的保护与可持续发展提供参考。
Abstract:
In the context of concentrated and contiguous conservation of traditional villages, measuring regional resilience levels and identifying resilience types are of great significance for coordinating the overall improvement of village resilience and contiguous conservation. Taking 429 national-level traditional villages in western Hunan as examples, this study constructs a three-dimensional resilience evaluation index system of "external disturbance-inherent brittleness-adaptive resilience" based on the resilience model, conducts a quantitative evaluation, and explores the overall resilience level of traditional villages in western Hunan. The obstacle degree model and dominant factor identification method are then used to classify resilience types and identify dominant obstacle factors. The results are as follows. (1) The comprehensive resilience of traditional villages in western Hunan is mostly at medium and low levels. The spatial pattern of cold and hot spots presents a "hot in the south and cold in the north" distribution, with high-high clusters concentrated in Huaihua City. (2) Resilience types of traditional villages include disturbance type, fragility type, resilience type, disturbance-fragility type, disturbance-resilience type, and fragility-resilience type. Combined with dominant obstacle factors, targeted resilience improvement strategies are proposed for each type, providing a reference for the conservation and sustainable development of traditional villages in western Hunan and similar concentrated and contiguous regions.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 泉 薛珊珊.乡村振兴背景下徽州传统村落保护与活化研究[J].中国名城,2020,(08):92.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):92.
[2]王金平,左 敬.基于空间句法的聚落空间解析及活化路径探析——以土岭头村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):60.
[3]陶诗琦.活态遗产视角下藏地传统村落价值认知与整体保护思路探索——以拉萨尼木县吞达村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(12):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(6):60.
[4]都铭,季丽慧.传统村落景观基因共生发展研究——以浙江省丽水市鸬鹚村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
　DU Ming,JI Lihui.Research on the Symbiotic Development of Landscape Genes in Traditional Villages：Taking the Luci Village in Lishui City，Zhejiang Province for Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
[5]杨建平,吴宗杰.文化地景的跨界建设——以山东三德范遗产保护为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
　YANG Jianping,WU Zongjie.Crossing Border Construction of Cultural Landscape Taking the Heritage Protection of Sande Fanzhuang in Shandong Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
[6]易桂秀,王益东,刘鹏.景德镇御窑厂整体申遗背景下传统村落保护发展研究——以景德镇市浮梁县高岭村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
　YI Guixiu,WANG Yidong,LIU Peng.Research on the Protection and Development of Traditional Villages under the Background of Jingdezhen Imperial Kilns——Taking Gaoling Village，Fuliang County，Jingdezhen City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
[7]杨大禹,周宇兴.传统村落“微介入”保护更新规划路径探究——以云南省腾冲市董官村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
　YANG Dayu,ZHOU Yuxing.Exploration on the Path of“Micro-intervention”Protection and Renewal Planning for Traditional Villages：Taking Dongguan Village，Tengchong City，Yunnan Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
[8]姚刚,乔楠.面向环境归属感重塑的传统村落活化更新设计策略研究——以徐州市铜山区大彭镇王楼村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
　YAO Gang,QIAO Nan.Research on the Design Strategy of Traditional Village Activation and Renewal for the Remodeling of Environmental Belonging：Taking Wanglou Village，Dapeng Town，Tongshan District，Xuzhou City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
[9]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[10]李久林,杨宣宣,汪勇政,等.乡村振兴背景下传统村落地方认同评估——以安徽省歙县为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(5):67.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.005.009]
　LI Jiulin,YANG Xuanxuan,WANG Yongzheng,et al.Local Identity Assessment of Traditional Villages in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Taking Shexian County, Anhui Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(6):67.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.005.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-15