[1]丁春梅,段德罡.基于规划正义的乡村文化遗产保护“责-权-利”重构路径研究[J].中国名城,2026,40(6):54-64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.007]
　DING Chunmei,DUAN Degang.Research on the Reconstruction Path of "Responsibilities-Rights-Interests" in Rural Cultural Heritage Protection Based on Planning Justice[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(6):54-64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.007]
点击复制

基于规划正义的乡村文化遗产保护“责-权-利”重构路径研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年6期
页码:
54-64
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Reconstruction Path of "Responsibilities-Rights-Interests" in Rural Cultural Heritage Protection Based on Planning Justice
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）006-0054-11
作者:
丁春梅; 段德罡
丁春梅，西安建筑科技大学建筑学院博士研究生；段德罡（通信作者），西安建筑科技大学建筑学院教授，博士生导师。
Author(s):
DING Chunmei; DUAN Degang
关键词:
乡村文化遗产; 责-权-利; 规划正义; 多元主体; 协同保护; 陕西省
Keywords:
rural cultural heritage; responsibilities-rights-interests; planning justice; multiple subjects; collaborative protection; Shaanxi Province
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.006.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
乡村文化遗产保护的实践困境根源在于多元主体间“责-权-利”配置的错位与失衡。乡村文化遗产保护对象可划分为法定遗产、非名录遗产及遗产关联空间三类，其保护主体包括：作为核心主体的村民与村集体、作为主导主体的中央及地方政府、作为驱动主体的市场资本和作为协调主体的社会组织与专家学者。融合权利关系、规划正义与协同治理理论，构建适用于乡村文化遗产保护的“责-权-利”协同分析框架，选取西安市长安区4处乡村文化遗产作为实证案例，通过实地调研与深入解析，识别并剖析行政主导—客体错配、行政主导—主体悬置、市场主导—产权虚置和社区主导—多元共创4种典型的“责-权-利”配置模式及其深层机理，并提出基于保护对象属性差异的“责-权-利”配置方式。基于规划正义的价值理念，提出从程序正义、分配正义和承认正义3个维度构建协同保护路径，即通过程序正义重塑多元主体参与机制、以分配正义构建可持续的利益共享格局、以承认正义强化社区文化主体性。
Abstract:
The practical predicament of rural cultural heritage protection lies in the misalignment and imbalance of the "responsibilities-rights-interests" allocation among multiple stakeholders. The objects of rural cultural heritage protection can be classified into three categories: legal heritage, non-listed heritage, and heritage-related spaces. The protection subjects include villagers and village collectives as the core subjects, central and local governments as the leading subjects, market capital as the driving subjects, and social organizations and experts as the coordinating subjects. By integrating theories of rights relations, planning justice, and collaborative governance, a "responsibilities-rights-interests" collaborative analysis framework suitable for the protection of rural cultural heritage is constructed. Four rural cultural heritage protection cases in Chang’an District, Xi’an City are selected as empirical examples. Through field research and in-depth analysis, four typical responsibilities-rights-interests allocation models and their underlying mechanisms are identified and analyzed, namely, administrative dominance - object mismatch, administrative dominance - subject suspension, market dominance - property rights vacancy, and community dominance - multi-party co-creation. Subsequently, a responsibilities-rights-interests allocation approach based on the attribute differences of the protected objects is proposed. Based on the value concept of planning justice, a collaborative protection path is proposed from three dimensions: procedural justice, distributive justice, and recognition justice. That is, to reshape the multi-subject participation mechanism through procedural justice, to build a sustainable interest-sharing pattern through distributive justice, and to strengthen the cultural subjectivity of the community through recognition justice.

相似文献/References:

[1]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(6):3.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-15