[1]陈 瑜,徐小湾.从问卷调查到沉浸体验：共生视角下城市更新公众参与技术的范式转变[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):18-27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.003]
　CHEN Yu,XU Xiaowan.From Questionnaires to Immersive Experience: the Paradigm Shift of Public Participation Technologies in Urban Renewal from a Symbiotic Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(2):18-27.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.003]
点击复制

从问卷调查到沉浸体验：共生视角下城市更新公众参与技术的范式转变()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年2期
页码:
18-27
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
From Questionnaires to Immersive Experience: the Paradigm Shift of Public Participation Technologies in Urban Renewal from a Symbiotic Perspective
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）002-0018-10
作者:
陈 瑜; 徐小湾
陈 瑜，清华大学未来实验室、清华大学建筑学院博士研究生；徐小湾，清华大学未来实验室、清华大学美术学院博士研究生。
Author(s):
CHEN Yu; XU Xiaowan
关键词:
共生城市; 城市更新; 公众参与; 技术工具
Keywords:
symbiotic cities; urban renewal; public participation; technical tools
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在城市治理由“管理”向“共治”转型的背景下，公众参与逐渐成为影响城市更新可持续性的关键机制。技术演进的本质不仅是工具升级，而且是多主体参与关系的重构。研究引入“共生城市”的视角，梳理公众参与技术的代际演进特征，构建“社会-空间-技术”三元分析框架。基于城市更新中多主体协同、空间协商与持续反馈的需求，系统探讨了公众参与技术的范式转变对共生城市的推动作用。基于北京10个街区的实践访谈，评估了不同参与技术对现实更新需求的回应程度，并提出面向城市更新不同阶段的混合型技术应用思路。研究认为，公众参与技术变革的核心不在于单一技术的突破，而在于构建包容的“共生型”技术生态，推动可持续的城市更新。
Abstract:
As urban governance shifts from "management" to "co-governance," public participation has become a key mechanism influencing the sustainability of urban renewal. With technological advancement, technologies for public participation are evolving from one-way consultation toward digital interaction and immersive experience. This trasformation reflecting not only tool upgrades but also a restructuring of participatory relationships. From the perspective of the "symbiotic city," this paper reviews the generational evolution of urban participatory technologies and develops a social-spatial-technical analytical framework. Focusing on multi-actor collaboration, spatial negotiation, and continuous feedback in urban renewal, it examines how technological transformation supports urban symbiosis. Based on interviews in 10 urban blocks in Beijing, the study evaluates the responsiveness of different participatory tools and proposes a hybrid application strategy for different renewal stages. The study argues that the value of participatory technologies trasformation lies not in single-tool innovation, but in building an inclusive symbiotic technological ecosystem that promotes sustainable urban renewal.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(2):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
　LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
　YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area：a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
　CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City：a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
　LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal：Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
　LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
　CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration：the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-02-24