[1]刘邵远,王 军,杜晓帆.城市更新背景下文化遗产保护的问题与思考[J].中国名城,2026,40(2):3-10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.001]
　LIU Shaoyuan,WANG Jun,DU Xiaofan.Issues and Reflections on Cultural Heritage Conservation under the Background of Urban Renewal[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(2):3-10.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.001]
点击复制

城市更新背景下文化遗产保护的问题与思考()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年2期
页码:
3-10
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Issues and Reflections on Cultural Heritage Conservation under the Background of Urban Renewal
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）002-0003-07
作者:
刘邵远; 王 军; 杜晓帆
刘邵远，复旦大学文物与博物馆学系博士后研究员；王 军，复旦大学文物与博物馆学系博士研究生；杜晓帆（通信作者），复旦大学国土与文化资源研究中心教授，联合国教科文组织活态遗产与社区发展教席主持人。
Author(s):
LIU Shaoyuan; WANG Jun; DU Xiaofan
关键词:
城市更新; 城市遗产; 新旧融合; 以人为本; 活态传承
Keywords:
urban renewal; urban heritage; integration of the old and the new; people orientation; living inheritance
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.002.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国城市更新已从增量扩张转向存量提质，城市遗产保护的理论与实践面临重要转型。立足我国快速城市化历程，反思以物质隔离和功能划分为主的保护模式，揭示其在城市更新中引发的“新旧分离”“去生活化”“重物轻人”等问题及对社会活力和文化连续性的潜在侵蚀。通过对历史案例与当代实践的分析，文章强调城市遗产不仅是历史遗存，更是嵌入城市系统、参与社会生产和文化建构的“活态存在”。基于此，提出以人为本、社区参与和文化记忆再生产是实现活态传承的核心路径。城市遗产保护应兼顾历史连续性与现代功能，通过多元主体协同和社会联结机制，强化城市人文精神、提升社会韧性。旨在从理论视角深化对城市遗产保护内涵、价值与功能的认识，为城市更新中的遗产政策与实践提供学理参考。
Abstract:
Urban renewal in China has shifted from incremental expansion to stock-based governance, posing significant theoretical and practical challenges for urban heritage conservation. This paper, grounded in the trajectory of rapid urbanization, critically examines preservation approaches dominated by material isolation and functional zoning, highlighting their unintended consequences- ’new-old separation’, ’decontextualization of life’ and ’emphasis on objects over people’ -and their latent erosion of social vitality and cultural continuity. Through analysis of historical cases and contemporary practices, the study emphasizes that urban heritage is not merely a historical relic but an ’living entity’ embedded within urban systems and participating in social production and cultural construction. Accordingly, the paper proposes that people-oriented approaches, community participation, and the reproduction of cultural memory are core pathways for achieving living heritage preservation. Urban heritage protection should balance historical continuity with contemporary functionality, leveraging multi-stakeholder collaboration and social connectivity to strengthen urban humanistic spirit, enhance social resilience, and provide theoretical support for sustainable urban governance. This study aims to advance a theoretical understanding of the meaning, value, and function of urban heritage, offering scholarly guidance for heritage policies and practices in the context of urban renewal.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(2):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
　LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
　YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area：a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
　CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City：a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
　LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal：Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
　LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
　CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration：the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(2):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-02-24