[1]周 红,彭 怡,余翰武.文化生态视角下湖南省非遗与传统村落的空间错位格局、驱动机制及保护研究[J].中国名城,2025,39(12):71-78.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.012.009]
　ZHOU Hong,PENG Yi,YU Hanwu.Research on the Spatial Misalignment Pattern, Driving the Mechanism and Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Traditional Villages in Hunan Province from the Perspective of Cultural Ecology[J].China Ancient City,2025,39(12):71-78.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.012.009]
点击复制

文化生态视角下湖南省非遗与传统村落的空间错位格局、驱动机制及保护研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
39
期数:
2025年12期
页码:
71-78
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Spatial Misalignment Pattern, Driving the Mechanism and Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Traditional Villages in Hunan Province from the Perspective of Cultural Ecology
文章编号:
1674-4144（2025）012-0071-08
作者:
周 红; 彭 怡; 余翰武
周 红，湖南科技大学建筑与设计学院教授，博士；彭 怡，湖南科技大学建筑与设计学院硕士研究生；余翰武（通信作者），湖南科技大学建筑与设计学院教授。
Author(s):
ZHOU Hong; PENG Yi; YU Hanwu
关键词:
非物质文化遗产; 传统村落; 空间错位; 湖南省; 地理探测器
Keywords:
intangible cultural heritage; traditional villages; spatial misalignment; Hunan province; geographical detector
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2025.012.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对当前非遗保护面临传承人老龄化、传统村落与非遗的“活态关联”断裂等保护困境，从文化生态学视角，聚焦湖南省137项国家级非物质文化遗产与704个国家级传统村落，运用核密度、空间重心模型、空间错位距离、空间错位指数、景观空间关联指数及地理探测器等研究方法，系统分析非遗与传统村落空间位置关系及分异成因，从文化生态视角为两者的保护与协同利用提供科学依据。研究发现：（1）湖南省非遗与传统村落分别呈现“大集聚-小分散”与“西南密集-东北稀疏”的空间分布特性。（2）湖南省非遗与传统村落分布正向错位区主要集中在湖南东北部地区，负向错位区主要集中在湖南西南部地区。（3）常住人口、艺术馆与文化馆数量是湖南省非遗与传统村落空间分布格局形成的两个关键性因素；城镇化率、公路里程数、人均地方财政收入等社会环境因素是非遗与传统村落空间错位重要影响因素；DEM、GDP、第三产业生产总值等自然与经济因素是非遗与传统村落空间错位间接影响因素。
Abstract:
Addressing the current challenges in intangible cultural heritage preservation, including the ageing of practitioners and the disruption of the ’living connection’ between traditional villages and intangible cultural heritage, this study adopts a cultural ecology perspective, focusing on 137 national-level intangible cultural heritage items and 704 national-level traditional villages in Hunan Province. Employing the research methods including kernel density analysis, spatial gravity model, spatial displacement distance, spatial misalignment index, landscape spatial association index, and geographic detector, it systematically analyses the spatial relationship and causes of divergence between intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages. This provides scientific grounds for their protection and synergistic utilisation from a cultural ecology standpoint. The findings reveal: ①Hunan’s intangible cultural heritage exhibits a ’large-scale clustering with minor dispersion’ spatial pattern, while traditional villages display ’southwest-heavy concentration with northeast-sparse distribution’; ②Positive spatial misalignment zones predominantly occur in northeastern Hunan, whereas negative misalignment zones concentrate in the southwest; ③Permanent population and the number of art galleries and cultural centres are two key factors shaping the spatial distribution patterns of intangible cultural heritage and traditional villages in Hunan. Social environmental factors such as urbanisation rate, road mileage, and per capita local fiscal revenue significantly influence spatial misalignment. Natural and economic factors including DEM, GDP, and tertiary industry output value exert indirect effects on spatial misalignment.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 泉 薛珊珊.乡村振兴背景下徽州传统村落保护与活化研究[J].中国名城,2020,(08):92.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(12):92.
[2]王金平,左 敬.基于空间句法的聚落空间解析及活化路径探析——以土岭头村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(12):60.
[3]陶诗琦.活态遗产视角下藏地传统村落价值认知与整体保护思路探索——以拉萨尼木县吞达村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(12):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(12):60.
[4]都铭,季丽慧.传统村落景观基因共生发展研究——以浙江省丽水市鸬鹚村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
　DU Ming,JI Lihui.Research on the Symbiotic Development of Landscape Genes in Traditional Villages：Taking the Luci Village in Lishui City，Zhejiang Province for Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
[5]杨建平,吴宗杰.文化地景的跨界建设——以山东三德范遗产保护为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
　YANG Jianping,WU Zongjie.Crossing Border Construction of Cultural Landscape Taking the Heritage Protection of Sande Fanzhuang in Shandong Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
[6]易桂秀,王益东,刘鹏.景德镇御窑厂整体申遗背景下传统村落保护发展研究——以景德镇市浮梁县高岭村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
　YI Guixiu,WANG Yidong,LIU Peng.Research on the Protection and Development of Traditional Villages under the Background of Jingdezhen Imperial Kilns——Taking Gaoling Village，Fuliang County，Jingdezhen City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
[7]杨大禹,周宇兴.传统村落“微介入”保护更新规划路径探究——以云南省腾冲市董官村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
　YANG Dayu,ZHOU Yuxing.Exploration on the Path of“Micro-intervention”Protection and Renewal Planning for Traditional Villages：Taking Dongguan Village，Tengchong City，Yunnan Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
[8]姚刚,乔楠.面向环境归属感重塑的传统村落活化更新设计策略研究——以徐州市铜山区大彭镇王楼村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
　YAO Gang,QIAO Nan.Research on the Design Strategy of Traditional Village Activation and Renewal for the Remodeling of Environmental Belonging：Taking Wanglou Village，Dapeng Town，Tongshan District，Xuzhou City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
[9]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[10]陈 岚,谭 林,陈春华,等.基于非物质文化遗产空间结构特征的规划发展路径——以绵阳市为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(3):38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.006]
　CHEN Lan,TAN Lin,CHEN Chunhua,et al.The Spatial Pattern of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Mianyang City and the Planning Response Path[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(12):38.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.003.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-15