[1]王 萌,韦雅丽.基于未来社区视角的老旧小区适老化改造效应评价研究——以杭州市为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(10):78-83.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.011]
 WANG Meng,WEI Yali.Research on the Evaluation of the Aging Adaptation Effect of Old Residential Areas from the Perspective of Future Communities: A Case Study of Hangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(10):78-83.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.011]
点击复制

基于未来社区视角的老旧小区适老化改造效应评价研究——以杭州市为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
78-83
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Evaluation of the Aging Adaptation Effect of Old Residential Areas from the Perspective of Future Communities: A Case Study of Hangzhou City
文章编号:
1674-4144(2024)010-0078-06
作者:
王 萌韦雅丽
王 萌,浙江财经大学公共管理学院副教授,博士;韦雅丽(通信作者),浙江财经大学公共管理学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
WANG MengWEI Yali
关键词:
城市更新未来社区老旧小区改造适老化杭州市
Keywords:
urban renewalFuture Communitiesrenovation of old residential areassuitability for agingHangzhou City
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.010.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
老旧小区改造是城市更新的关键环节,小区适老化改造是适应老龄化社会的必要措施,浙江省未来社区的提出为老旧小区再营造提供了参考指向。基于未来社区的邻里、教育、健康、交通、服务和治理场景构建评价指标,量化评价杭州市老旧小区适老化改造的效益,并解析其不足之处。以杭州市海月花园和河畔新村两个小区为例,通过实地访谈、问卷调查,基于专家打分和AHP层次分析法进行综合评分和比较分析。结果发现,健康场景、服务场景等在适老化改造中的关注度最大,而多样化服务、治理沟通体系、文化交流活动以及平台场所搭建是适老化改造效应发挥的关键。基于此,提出拆改型小区实现未来社区目标的路径建议。
Abstract:
The renovation of old residential areas is a key link in urban renewal, and the aging-friendly transformation is a necessary measure to adapt to an aging society. The proposal of Future Communities in Zhejiang Province provides a reference point for the reconstruction of old residential areas. This study constructs evaluation indicators based on the scenarios of neighborhood, education, health, transportation, service, and governance in Future Communities, quantifies the benefits of the aging-friendly transformation of old residential areas in Hangzhou City, and analyzes its shortcomings. With the two residential areas of Haiyue Garden and Hepan New Village in Hangzhou City as examples, through field interviews and questionnaire surveys, comprehensive scoring and comparative analysis are conducted based on expert scoring and AHP analytic hierarchy process. It is found that the health scenario and service scenario are the most concerned in the aging-friendly transformation, while diversified services, governance communication system, cultural exchange activities, and platform venue construction are the key to the effectiveness of the aging-friendly transformation. Based on this, this study proposes path suggestions for the demolition and reconstruction of residential areas to achieve the goal of Future Communities.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(10):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
 Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era:Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
 LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
 YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area:a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
 CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City:a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
 LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal:Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
 LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
 YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
 CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration:the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang,Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(10):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-12