[1]李泽新,杨新旗,王婷.双重博弈结构下城市更新协作机制及转变趋势研究——以重庆市渝中区为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(7):24-30.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.004]
　LI Zexin,YANG Xinqi,WANG Ting.Research on Urban Renewal Cooperation Mechanism and Transformation Trend under Dual-Game Structure: Take Yuzhong District of Chongqing as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(7):24-30.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.004]
点击复制

双重博弈结构下城市更新协作机制及转变趋势研究——以重庆市渝中区为例()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
37
期数:
2023年7期
页码:
24-30
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-07-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Urban Renewal Cooperation Mechanism and Transformation Trend under Dual-Game Structure: Take Yuzhong District of Chongqing as an Example
文章编号:
1674-4144（2023）007-0024-07
作者:
李泽新; 杨新旗; 王婷
李泽新，重庆大学建筑城规学院山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室教授；杨新旗，重庆大学建筑城规学院硕士研究生；王婷，重庆市永川区人民政府办公室四级主任科员。
Author(s):
LI Zexin; YANG Xinqi; WANG Ting
关键词:
双重博弈; 城市更新; 协作机制; 更新转型; 重庆市; 渝中区
Keywords:
dual game; urban renewal; cooperation mechanism; renewal transformation; Chongqing City; Yuzhong District
分类号:
TU984.2
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.007.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着中国经济从高速度增长转化为高质量发展，城市更新也呈现出治理导向、多元协作的时代特征。立足城市更新的利益博弈本质，基于双重博弈结构的分析框架，认为政府面临着与城市发展中政绩考核的长期、重复博弈，而与具体更新项目中的资本和公众存在短期、单次博弈，从而形成了双重博弈影响下的更新决策行为偏好。在经济高速发展时期，政府与企业形成了推动城市快速更新的增长联盟，而进入高质量发展时期，治理机制改革，增长联盟瓦解。由此，城市更新在焕新城市面貌、刺激经济发展的基础上，更加注重回应社会诉求，保障社会公平，提升城市更新的治理效用。结合重庆市渝中区城市更新实例，分析不同城市更新阶段的思路转变、协作机制变化和更新评估机制创新，以期为中国新时期城市更新协作机制研究提供参考。
Abstract:
With the transformation of China’s economic development from high-speed growth to high-quality development, urban renewal has also shown the characteristics of governance-oriented and diversified cooperation in the era. Based on the essence of the interest game in urban renewal and the analysis framework of a dual game structure, it is believed that the government faces a long-term and repeated game with the performance evaluation in urban development; There is a short-term, single game between the capital and the public in specific update projects, resulting in a preference for update decision-making behavior under the influence of a "dual game". During the period of rapid economic development, the government and enterprises formed a "growth alliance" to promote rapid urban renewal. But in the period of high-quality development, governance mechanism has reformed and the growth alliance has disintegrated. Therefore, on the basis of revitalizing cityscape and stimulating economic development, urban renewal pays more attention to responding to social demands, ensuring social equity, and improving the governance effectiveness of urban renewal. Based on the case of urban renewal in Yuzhong District of Chongqing, this paper analyzes the change of ideas, changes of cooperation mechanism and innovation of renewal evaluation mechanism in different stages of urban renewal, with a view to providing reference for the study of urban renewal cooperation mechanism in the new era of China.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(7):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
　LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
　YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area：a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
　CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City：a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
　LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal：Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
　LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
　CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration：the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(7):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-24