[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35-41.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(09):35-41.
点击复制

基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例()
分享到：

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
期数:
2020年09期
页码:
35-41
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-09-05

文章信息/Info

作者:
李渊; 黄竞雄; 李芝也
李 渊，厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院教授，博士。
黄竞雄 ，厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院硕士研究生。
李芝也，厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院助理教授，博士。
关键词:
共生理论; 历史文化街区; 旅游策划; 城市更新; 厦门市中山路片区
Keywords:
Symbiosis Theory; historical and cultural block; tourism planning; urban renewal; Xiamen Zhongshan Road
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
历史文化街区作为旧城的核心，是城市更新的重点区域，发展旅游已成为街区重要的更新方法之一。然而，目前历史文化街区旅游发展面临着文化发展不充分、商业同质化程度高、开发深度不足等问题，削弱了旅游者对于文化价值的感知，一定程度上阻碍了街区的文化遗产保护与传承，而共生理论对于不同单元在同一环境中的协同发展提出了可借鉴的思路。对我国历史文化街区的旅游发展进行探讨，以厦门市中山路历史文化街区为例，应用文本数据进行旅游者旅游意象的研读，结合历史文化的挖掘，基于共生理论提出旅游概念规划方案。研究发现：（1）旅游者对于中山路历史文化街区的文化意象感知显著低于商业感知，未能形成良好的文旅共生关系；（2）中山路步行街业态发展同质化程度高，存在降低吸引力的风险；（3）街区内部街巷杂乱闭塞，阻碍文化-商业-旅游三类单元的良性互动。基于此认知，引入共生理论，建立文化-商业-旅游共生体系，为历史文化街区旅游发展中不同共生单元之间的互利共生提供可借鉴的方法与理论体系。
Abstract:
As the core of old city, historical and cultural blocks are the focus of urban renewal, and developing tourism has become an important method for renewal of such blocks. However, current development of historical and cultural blocks faces problems such as insufficient cultural development, homogenization of commercial development and insufficient development depth, which has weakened tourists’ perception of cultural heritage, leading to obstacles to the protection and transmission of cultural heritage in the blocks. Symbiosis Theory proposes a concept that can be used for collaborative development of different units in the same environment. This paper discusses tourism development of China’s historical and cultural blocks, and takes Xiamen Zhongshan Road historical and cultural block as an example, uses text data to research image of this block and excavate history and culture of this block, then proposes a tourism concept planning based on symbiosis theory. This paper found that: 1) Tourists’ perception of cultural imagery on Zhongshan Road is significantly lower than commercial perception, failing to form a good symbiotic relationship between culture and tourism. 2) Zhongshan Road has a high degree of homogeneity in development, and there is a risk of reducing attractiveness. 3) Cluttered lanes inside this block have a negative impact on the benign interaction of culture-commerce-tourism units. Based on this cognition, this paper introduces Symbiosis Theory to establish a culture-commerce-tourism symbiosis system, which can provide a method and theoretical system for mutually beneficial symbiosis between different symbiosis units in the development of tourism in historical and cultural blocks.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 原,陆晓东.大数据背景下的广州历史文化街区活力定量研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):53.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(09):53.
[2]尚 伟,张金海,吴子悦.历史街区自发性商业空间特性及其对街区活力提升研究——以汉正街为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):34.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(09):34.
[3]李 智,王胡军.基于肌理重构的历史文化街区抢救式保护方法探究——以万载县田下历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):67.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(09):67.
[4]冯维波,刘有于.山地古镇利益主体共生互动关系研究——以湖南里耶古镇为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):76.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(09):76.
[5]尚伟,何聪,兰海峰,等.历史文化街区自发性空间研究——以武汉市昙华林自发性空间功能及形式为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
　SHANG Wei,HE Cong,LAN Haifeng,et al.A Study on the Spontaneous Space of Historic Blocks：Taking Spontaneous Spatial Function and Form of Wuhan Tanhualin as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(09):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
[6]刘仁义,张馨月,张笑笑.数字化技术在历史文化街区保护中的应用——以黄山市屯溪老街为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(5):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
　LIU Renyi,ZHANG Xinyue,ZHANG Xiaoxiao.Application of Digital Protection Technology for Historical and Cultural Blocks：A Case of Tunxi Old Street in Huangshan City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(09):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
[7]申世广,张珮瑶.基于多源数据的历史文化街区品质评估——以河南洛阳老城东、西南隅历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
　SHEN Shiguang,ZHANG Peiyao.Quality Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-source Data：A Case Study of the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Luoyang Old City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(09):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
[8]陈月,汪德根.历史文化街区的“生活延续性”评价与保护更新策略——以扬州仁丰里、南河下与东关街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
　CHEN Yue,WANG Degen.Evaluation of“Continuity of Life”and Strategies for the Safeguarding and Renewal of Historic Conservation Areas：Case Study on Renfengli，Nanhexia and Dongguan Blocks in Yangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(09):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
[9]王小斌,刘峻君,刘翔宇.城市历史文化街区的空间调查与活化利用途径探析——以绍兴鲁迅故里历史文化街区、八字桥历史文化街区为主例[J].中国名城,2021,(02):72.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(09):72.
[10]兰伟杰.单位大院型历史文化街区的保护更新策略初探——以九江老地委大院为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]
　LAN Weijie.Conservation and Renovation Strategy of The Unit Compound Historic Conservation Area: A Case Study of Former Municipal Committee Compound in Jiujiang[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(09):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-27