[1]周 红,祝维亭.基于GIS-DEA-MI模型的历史文化街区可持续发展效率对比研究——以长沙太平街和成都宽窄巷子为例[J].中国名城,2024,38(3):57-63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.003.008]
 ZHOU Hong,ZHU Weiting.Comparative Study on Sustainable Development Efficiency of Historical and Cultural Districts Based on GIS-DEA-MI Model: A Case Study of Taiping Street in Changsha and Kuanzhai Alley in Chengdu[J].China Ancient City,2024,38(3):57-63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.003.008]
点击复制

基于GIS-DEA-MI模型的历史文化街区可持续发展效率对比研究——以长沙太平街和成都宽窄巷子为例()
分享到:

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
38
期数:
2024年3期
页码:
57-63
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-03-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study on Sustainable Development Efficiency of Historical and Cultural Districts Based on GIS-DEA-MI Model: A Case Study of Taiping Street in Changsha and Kuanzhai Alley in Chengdu
文章编号:
1674-4144(2024)003-0057-07
作者:
周 红祝维亭
周 红,湖南科技大学建筑与艺术设计学院教授;祝维亭,湖南科技大学建筑与艺术设计学院硕士研究生。
Author(s):
ZHOU HongZHU Weiting
关键词:
GIS-DEA-MI模型历史文化街区可持续发展效率太平街宽窄巷子
Keywords:
GIS-DEA-MI modelhistorical and cultural districtsustainable development efficiencyTaiping StreetKuanzhai Alley
分类号:
TU984.114
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2024.003.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对历史文化街区进行全面评价有利于发掘历史街区的潜力,为街区的可持续发展提供依据。因此,以长沙太平街和成都宽窄巷子两处历史文化街区为研究对象,创新建立基于GIS-DEA-MI模型的多维度的评价方法,对上述两处历史文化街区的空间发展效率和非空间发展效率动态变化进行比较分析,结果表明:两处历史文化街区的空间发展效率基本相同,而非空间发展效率存在明显差异的原因与历史文化街区在空间形态、经济业态、文化活态、环境生态的规划利用有关。更客观、更全面地研究历史文化街区的发展效率,以期为实现历史文化街区的保护更新和可持续发展提供支撑。
Abstract:
A comprehensive evaluation of historic and cultural districts is conducive to exploring the potential of historic districts and providing a basis for their sustainable development. Therefore, this study takes Changsha Taiping Street and Chengdu Kuanzhai Alley as the objects of study, innovatively establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation method based on the GIS-DEA-MI model, and carries out a comparative analysis of the dynamic changes in spatial and non-spatial development efficiency of the two historical and cultural districts, so as to more objectively and comprehensively study the development efficiency of the historical and cultural districts with a view to achieving the conservation, renewal and sustainable development of the historical and cultural districts. The results show that the two historic and cultural districts have the same spatial and non-spatial development efficiency. The results show that the spatial development efficiency of the two historic and cultural districts is basically the same, while the reason for the obvious difference in the non-spatial development efficiency is related to the planning and use of the historic and cultural districts in terms of spatial form, economic business, cultural activities, environment and ecology.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 原,陆晓东.大数据背景下的广州历史文化街区活力定量研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):53.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(3):53.
[2]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(3):35.
[3]尚 伟,张金海,吴子悦.历史街区自发性商业空间特性及其对街区活力提升研究——以汉正街为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):34.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(3):34.
[4]李 智,王胡军.基于肌理重构的历史文化街区抢救式保护方法探究——以万载县田下历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):67.
 [J].China Ancient City,2020,(3):67.
[5]尚伟,何聪,兰海峰,等.历史文化街区自发性空间研究——以武汉市昙华林自发性空间功能及形式为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
 SHANG Wei,HE Cong,LAN Haifeng,et al.A Study on the Spontaneous Space of Historic Blocks:Taking Spontaneous Spatial Function and Form of Wuhan Tanhualin as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(3):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
[6]刘仁义,张馨月,张笑笑.数字化技术在历史文化街区保护中的应用——以黄山市屯溪老街为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(5):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
 LIU Renyi,ZHANG Xinyue,ZHANG Xiaoxiao.Application of Digital Protection Technology for Historical and Cultural Blocks:A Case of Tunxi Old Street in Huangshan City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(3):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
[7]申世广,张珮瑶.基于多源数据的历史文化街区品质评估——以河南洛阳老城东、西南隅历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
 SHEN Shiguang,ZHANG Peiyao.Quality Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-source Data:A Case Study of the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Luoyang Old City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(3):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
[8]陈月,汪德根.历史文化街区的“生活延续性”评价与保护更新策略——以扬州仁丰里、南河下与东关街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
 CHEN Yue,WANG Degen.Evaluation of“Continuity of Life”and Strategies for the Safeguarding and Renewal of Historic Conservation Areas:Case Study on Renfengli,Nanhexia and Dongguan Blocks in Yangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(3):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
[9]王小斌,刘峻君,刘翔宇.城市历史文化街区的空间调查与活化利用途径探析——以绍兴鲁迅故里历史文化街区、八字桥历史文化街区为主例[J].中国名城,2021,(02):72.
 [J].China Ancient City,2021,(3):72.
[10]兰伟杰.单位大院型历史文化街区的保护更新策略初探——以九江老地委大院为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]
 LAN Weijie.Conservation and Renovation Strategy of The Unit Compound Historic Conservation Area: A Case Study of Former Municipal Committee Compound in Jiujiang[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(3):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-25