[1]冀晶娟,邓晓彬,朱莉莎,等.县域传统村落景观韧性评价与提升——以桂林市灌阳县为例[J].中国名城,2026,40(9):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.011]
　JI Jingjuan,DENG Xiaobin,ZHU Lisha,et al.Assessment and Enhancement of Landscape Resilience of Traditional Villages in a County: A Case Study of Guanyang County, Guilin City[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(9):88-96.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.011]
点击复制

县域传统村落景观韧性评价与提升——以桂林市灌阳县为例()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年9期
页码:
88-96
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment and Enhancement of Landscape Resilience of Traditional Villages in a County: A Case Study of Guanyang County, Guilin City
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）009-0088-09
作者:
冀晶娟; 邓晓彬; 朱莉莎; 金 樾; 邓春凤
冀晶娟，桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院教授，博士生导师；邓晓彬，桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院硕士研究生；朱莉莎，桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院，讲师；金 樾，桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院副教授；邓春凤，桂林理工大学旅游与风景园林学院教授。
Author(s):
JI Jingjuan; DENG Xiaobin; ZHU Lisha; JIN Yue; DENG Chunfeng
关键词:
传统村落; 景观韧性; PSR模型; 评价体系; 广西灌阳
Keywords:
traditional villages; landscape resilience; PSR model; evaluation system; Guanyang; Guangxi
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
乡村景观韧性相关研究已成为学界关注的热点，但多聚焦单一或少数村落的研究，缺乏县域层面的多维整合评价。研究基于PSR（压力—状态—响应）模型，构建3个维度20个指标的传统村落景观韧性评价体系，运用层次分析法和熵值法取得综合权重，以广西灌阳县32个中国传统村落为例进行实证分析。根据评价结果，结合现状资源分析，将村落分为优化巩固型、专项突破型与系统提升型，并从压力、状态、响应3个层面提出差异化的景观韧性提升策略，为传统村落景观韧性研究探索理论方法，以期为系统性提升传统村落景观韧性和可持续发展提供参考。
Abstract:
Research on rural landscape resilience has become a focal point of scholarly attention; however, existing studies predominantly concentrate on single or a limited number of villages, with a notable deficiency in multi-dimensional integrated assessments at the county level. Based on the PSR (Pressure-State-Response) model, this study constructs a traditional village landscape resilience evaluation system comprising 20 indicators across three dimensions. Comprehensive weights are derived through the integration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Entropy Weight Method. An empirical analysis is conducted with the use of 32 traditional Chinese villages in Guanyang County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, as case studies. According to the evaluation results and combined with an analysis of current resources, the villages are classified into three categories: optimization and consolidation, targeted breakthrough, and systematic enhancement. Differentiated strategies for improving landscape resilience are proposed from the perspectives of pressure, state, and response, which is an attempt to explore theoretical and methodological approaches for traditional village landscape resilience research, with the aim of providing references for systematically enhancing landscape resilience and promoting sustainable development in traditional villages.

相似文献/References:

[1]张 泉 薛珊珊.乡村振兴背景下徽州传统村落保护与活化研究[J].中国名城,2020,(08):92.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):92.
[2]王金平,左 敬.基于空间句法的聚落空间解析及活化路径探析——以土岭头村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):60.
[3]陶诗琦.活态遗产视角下藏地传统村落价值认知与整体保护思路探索——以拉萨尼木县吞达村为例[J].中国名城,2020,(12):60.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):60.
[4]都铭,季丽慧.传统村落景观基因共生发展研究——以浙江省丽水市鸬鹚村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
　DU Ming,JI Lihui.Research on the Symbiotic Development of Landscape Genes in Traditional Villages：Taking the Luci Village in Lishui City，Zhejiang Province for Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):74.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.011]
[5]杨建平,吴宗杰.文化地景的跨界建设——以山东三德范遗产保护为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
　YANG Jianping,WU Zongjie.Crossing Border Construction of Cultural Landscape Taking the Heritage Protection of Sande Fanzhuang in Shandong Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):66.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.009]
[6]易桂秀,王益东,刘鹏.景德镇御窑厂整体申遗背景下传统村落保护发展研究——以景德镇市浮梁县高岭村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(10):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
　YI Guixiu,WANG Yidong,LIU Peng.Research on the Protection and Development of Traditional Villages under the Background of Jingdezhen Imperial Kilns——Taking Gaoling Village，Fuliang County，Jingdezhen City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):75.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.10.010]
[7]杨大禹,周宇兴.传统村落“微介入”保护更新规划路径探究——以云南省腾冲市董官村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
　YANG Dayu,ZHOU Yuxing.Exploration on the Path of“Micro-intervention”Protection and Renewal Planning for Traditional Villages：Taking Dongguan Village，Tengchong City，Yunnan Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):36.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.005]
[8]姚刚,乔楠.面向环境归属感重塑的传统村落活化更新设计策略研究——以徐州市铜山区大彭镇王楼村为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
　YAO Gang,QIAO Nan.Research on the Design Strategy of Traditional Village Activation and Renewal for the Remodeling of Environmental Belonging：Taking Wanglou Village，Dapeng Town，Tongshan District，Xuzhou City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):49.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.006]
[9]刘志宏.传统村落文化遗产数字化保护策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(12):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
　LIU Zhihong.Research on Digital Protection Strategy of Traditional Village Cultural Heritage[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):55.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.012.008]
[10]李久林,杨宣宣,汪勇政,等.乡村振兴背景下传统村落地方认同评估——以安徽省歙县为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(5):67.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.005.009]
　LI Jiulin,YANG Xuanxuan,WANG Yongzheng,et al.Local Identity Assessment of Traditional Villages in the Context of Rural Revitalization: Taking Shexian County, Anhui Province as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):67.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.005.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-09-15