[1]易照曌,高加欣,杨光灿,等.历史文化街区“行政＋技术”保护管理机制探索[J].中国名城,2026,40(9):82-87.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.010]
　YI Zhaozhao,GAO Jiaxin,YANG Guangcan,et al.Exploration on the Administrative?echnical Protection and Management Mechanism of Historic and Cultural Districts[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(9):82-87.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.010]
点击复制

历史文化街区“行政＋技术”保护管理机制探索()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年9期
页码:
82-87
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-09-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Exploration on the Administrative?echnical Protection and Management Mechanism of Historic and Cultural Districts
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）009-0082-06
作者:
易照曌; 高加欣; 杨光灿; 葛平安
易照曌，广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院有限公司历史文化名城研究所副所长，高级工程师；高加欣，广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院有限公司历史文化名城研究所规划师，工程师；杨光灿（通信作者），广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院有限公司历史文化名城研究所主任规划师，高级工程师；葛平安，广州市规划和自然资源局工程师。
Author(s):
YI Zhaozhao; GAO Jiaxin; YANG Guangcan; GE Pingan
关键词:
历史文化街区; 存量更新; 行政＋技术; 全流程治理; 广州市荔湾区
Keywords:
historic and cultural districts; stock-based urban regeneration; administrative-technical integration; full-process governance; Liwan District; Guangzhou City
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.009.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
存量更新背景下，历史文化街区普遍面临保护对象庞杂、主体诉求分化及治理资源不足的困境。既有研究多侧重空间设计或单一政策，对基层“行政监管-专业技术”耦合机制探讨不足。以广州荔湾区为实证，梳理国家至市级遗产保护法规，借鉴意大利、英国成熟经验，构建“事前咨询—事中巡查—事后验收”全流程闭环机制。研究表明，通过地方立法确立技术咨询法定地位，将技术团队嵌入审批链条，可有效填补一般建筑风貌管控盲区，降低居民更新门槛，实现风貌保护、民生改善与活力激发的平衡。该模式为高密度老城提供了可复制的“行政＋技术”基层治理经验。
Abstract:
In the context of urban regeneration in stock-based contexts, historic and cultural districts generally face the predicament of complex protection objects, divergent stakeholder demands, and insufficient governance resources. Existing studies mostly focus on spatial design or single-policy interpretations, lacking in-depth discussions on the coupling mechanism between "administrative supervision and professional technical expertise" at the grassroots level. Taking Liwan District in Guangzhou as an empirical case, this paper reviews heritage protection regulations from national to municipal levels, draws on mature experiences from Italy and the UK, and constructs a full-process closed-loop management mechanism of "pre-consultation, in-process inspection, and post-acceptance." The study shows that establishing the legal status of technical consultation through local legislation and embedding technical teams into the administrative approval chain can effectively fill the gaps in the style and feature control of general buildings, lower the threshold for residents’ renovations, and achieve a balance among style preservation, livelihood improvement, and vitality stimulation. This model provides replicable grassroots governance experience of an "administrative-technical" approach for high-density old urban areas.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 原,陆晓东.大数据背景下的广州历史文化街区活力定量研究[J].中国名城,2020,(07):53.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):53.
[2]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):35.
[3]尚 伟,张金海,吴子悦.历史街区自发性商业空间特性及其对街区活力提升研究——以汉正街为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):34.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):34.
[4]李 智,王胡军.基于肌理重构的历史文化街区抢救式保护方法探究——以万载县田下历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(11):67.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(9):67.
[5]尚伟,何聪,兰海峰,等.历史文化街区自发性空间研究——以武汉市昙华林自发性空间功能及形式为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(3):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
　SHANG Wei,HE Cong,LAN Haifeng,et al.A Study on the Spontaneous Space of Historic Blocks：Taking Spontaneous Spatial Function and Form of Wuhan Tanhualin as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):53.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.03.008]
[6]刘仁义,张馨月,张笑笑.数字化技术在历史文化街区保护中的应用——以黄山市屯溪老街为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(5):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
　LIU Renyi,ZHANG Xinyue,ZHANG Xiaoxiao.Application of Digital Protection Technology for Historical and Cultural Blocks：A Case of Tunxi Old Street in Huangshan City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):80.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.05.011]
[7]申世广,张珮瑶.基于多源数据的历史文化街区品质评估——以河南洛阳老城东、西南隅历史文化街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(8):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
　SHEN Shiguang,ZHANG Peiyao.Quality Evaluation of Historical and Cultural Blocks Based on Multi-source Data：A Case Study of the Southeast and Southwest Corners of Luoyang Old City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):63.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.08.009]
[8]陈月,汪德根.历史文化街区的“生活延续性”评价与保护更新策略——以扬州仁丰里、南河下与东关街区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(11):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
　CHEN Yue,WANG Degen.Evaluation of“Continuity of Life”and Strategies for the Safeguarding and Renewal of Historic Conservation Areas：Case Study on Renfengli，Nanhexia and Dongguan Blocks in Yangzhou City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(9):73.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.011.009]
[9]王小斌,刘峻君,刘翔宇.城市历史文化街区的空间调查与活化利用途径探析——以绍兴鲁迅故里历史文化街区、八字桥历史文化街区为主例[J].中国名城,2021,(02):72.
　[J].China Ancient City,2021,(9):72.
[10]兰伟杰.单位大院型历史文化街区的保护更新策略初探——以九江老地委大院为例[J].中国名城,2023,37(2):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]
　LAN Weijie.Conservation and Renovation Strategy of The Unit Compound Historic Conservation Area: A Case Study of Former Municipal Committee Compound in Jiujiang[J].China Ancient City,2023,37(9):28.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2023.002.004]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-09-15