[1]黄怀海,刘梦嘉,何文轩,等.城市更新背景下城市历史河道复明的多维价值与系统治理研究[J].中国名城,2026,40(5):34-41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.005.005]
　HUANG Huaihai,LIU Mengjia,HE Wenxuan,et al.A Study on the Multidimensional Value and Systematic Governance of Urban Historic River Daylighting under the Context of Urban Regeneration[J].China Ancient City,2026,40(5):34-41.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.005.005]
点击复制

城市更新背景下城市历史河道复明的多维价值与系统治理研究()

中国名城[ISSN:1674-4144/CN:32-1793/GO]

卷:
40
期数:
2026年5期
页码:
34-41
栏目:
出版日期:
2026-05-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Multidimensional Value and Systematic Governance of Urban Historic River Daylighting under the Context of Urban Regeneration
文章编号:
1674-4144（2026）005-0034-08
作者:
黄怀海; 刘梦嘉; 何文轩; 陈信自; 雷冰宇
黄怀海，中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司副总建筑师，正高级工程师；刘梦嘉（通信作者），中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司工程师；何文轩，中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司工程师；陈信自，中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司高级工程师；雷冰宇，中国建筑西南设计研究院有限公司前方工作室副总建筑师，高级工程师。
Author(s):
HUANG Huaihai; LIU Mengjia; HE Wenxuan; CHEN Xinzi; LEI Bingyu
关键词:
城市更新; 历史河道复明; 河道修复; 城市蓝绿基础设施
Keywords:
urban renewal; restoration of historical waterways; river restoration; green and blue urban infrastructure
分类号:
TU984
DOI:
10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2026.005.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在城市更新背景下，围绕历史河道复明的系统治理问题展开研究。首先，从生态与水文调节、社会文化与心理感知、经济与空间等维度，归纳其多维价值；在此基础上，进一步提出河道复明的实施前提与适用条件，指出其需要在水文基础、空间约束及综合效益评估的支撑下审慎推进。其次，从制度政策、跨部门协同与公众参与等方面，分析其推进机制及现实约束；进而梳理生态修复导向、公共空间重构、历史文化复兴与复合功能统筹等典型路径及其区域差异。最后，总结河道复明由工程措施向综合更新转变、由单点项目向系统治理演进，以及由经验借鉴向在地化探索转型的发展趋势。研究表明，河道复明正在成为连接城市生态基础设施与公共生活的重要纽带，其价值不仅在于改善水环境，更在于以“水”为线索重塑城市空间结构与场所认同。未来研究仍需要在多维价值量化评估、治理机制优化及在地实施路径等方面进一步深化。
Abstract:
This paper examines the systematic governance of urban historic river daylighting in the context of urban regeneration. It first synthesizes the multidimensional values of river daylighting from ecological and hydrological regulation, socio-cultural and psychological perception, as well as economic and spatial dimensions. On this basis, it further proposes the implementation prerequisites and applicability conditions, emphasizing that river daylighting is not a universally applicable strategy but should be cautiously promoted under the support of hydrological feasibility, spatial constraints, and comprehensive benefit evaluation. It then analyzes the driving mechanisms and practical constraints from the perspectives of institutional and policy support, cross-sectoral collaboration, and public participation. Furthermore, it reviews typical pathways—including ecological restoration-oriented, public space restructuring-oriented, historical-cultural revitalization-oriented, and integrated multifunctional approaches—as well as their regional variations. Finally, the study identifies three major trends: the shift from engineering intervention to comprehensive urban regeneration, from isolated projects to systemic governance, and from experience-based imitation to context-sensitive local exploration. The findings indicate that river daylighting is becoming a key link between urban ecological infrastructure and public life. Its significance lies not only in improving the water environment, but also in restructuring urban spatial systems and reinforcing place identity through water. Future research should further advance quantitative value assessment, governance optimization, and context-specific implementation strategies.

相似文献/References:

[1]李渊,黄竞雄,李芝也.基于共生理论的历史文化街区旅游概念规划研究——以厦门市中山路片区为例[J].中国名城,2020,(09):35.
　[J].China Ancient City,2020,(5):35.
[2]夏正伟,王轩轩.基于价值取向的轨道交通站域建成环境更新研究——以江苏昆山玉山广场站域为例[J].中国名城,2020,(10):52.
[3]本刊编辑部.新时代的名城保护与城市更新——第五届中国名城论坛综述[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):3.
　Editorial Department of This Journal.Protection and Renewal of Famous Cities in the New Era：Summary of the Fifth Forum of China Ancient City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):3.
[4]刘伯霞,刘 杰,王 田,等.国外城市更新理论与实践及其启示[J].中国名城,2022,36(1):15.
　LIU Boxia,LIU Jie,WANG Tian,et al.The Theory and Practice of Urban Renewal Abroad and Its Enlightenment[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):15.
[5]姚栋,杨挺,孙婉桐,等.城市更新中就近安置的居民满意度评价——以上海河间路保障房项目为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):66.
　YAO Dong,YANG Ting,SUN Wantong,et al.The Residents’Satisfaction Evaluation of Resettlement in Nearby Area：a Case Study of Shanghai Hejian Road Affordable Housing Project[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):66.
[6]车震宇,陈 宇.山地城市更新改造策略研究——以贵阳市老城区为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(2):75.
　CHE Zhenyu,CHEN Yu.A Study on the Strategy of Renewal and Transformation of Mountain City：a Case Study of the Old Town of Guiyang City[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):75.
[7]刘军民,汪子菡.城市更新与遗产保护的冲突和共生——以天水古城内古民居为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
　LIU Junmin,WANG Zihan.Conflict and Symbiosis Between the Heritage Conservation and Urban Renewal：Taking the Ancient Dwelling of Tianshui City as an Example[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):50.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.008]
[8]李博洋.“非典型历史城区”更新策略研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(4):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
　LI Boyang.Study on Renewal Strategy of “Atypical Historical Urban Area”[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):58.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.04.009]
[9]叶昌东,邓平平,姚华松,等.供需视角下城市更新中公共空间更新研究[J].中国名城,2022,36(7):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
　YE Changdong,DENG Pingping,YAO Huasong,et al.Research on Public Space in Urban Renewal from Supply-demand Perspective[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):17.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.07.003]
[10]陈曦,陈亚珉,徐粤.城市更新背景下历史建筑的活化利用——以苏州海红坊潘宅为例[J].中国名城,2022,36(9):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]
　CHEN Xi,CHEN Yamin,XU Yue.The Adaptive Use of Historical Buildings in the Context of Urban Regeneration：the Case of Pan House in Hai Hong Fang，Suzhou[J].China Ancient City,2022,36(5):64.[doi:10.19924/j.cnki.1674-4144.2022.09.007]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-06-02